ReviewMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2018
[Emergency Medicine : What do we need?]
Review in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Incidence and risk factors for cardiac arrest following upper cervical spine fractures in the elderly after minor trauma.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2026Article
- [The Cardiac Arrest Receiving Team based on the Freiburg model : Structuring of postresuscitation care following nontraumatic, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in an interdisciplinary team].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2026Review
- [Freiburg Cardiac Arrest Receiving Team (CART) : Interdisciplinary solution for the acute management of non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2020Article
- [Empirical health services research in emergency and acute medicine : Preliminary results of concomitant monitoring of patient recruitment and sample quality].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The timely medical treatment of the population in emergency situations is an enormous challenge for the healthcare system and is becoming increasingly more important. Due to this development clinical acute and emergency medicine has undergone enormous progress and is in the process of further professionalization. Various specialist societies and medical associations have published essential position papers in recent years and demanded fundamentally new healthcare structures and assignments. Additionally, emergency medical healthcare structures and centers have already been established on the initiative of individual emergency medical specialist disciplines. The future challenge is the nationwide establishment, grouping and integration of the structures and processes within definitive healthcare centers. The main objective of all involved must be the optimal care of emergency patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29671036What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.