Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29670895›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2018

Comparison between Amblyopia Treatment with Glasses Only and Combination of Glasses and Open-Type Binocular "Occlu-Pad" Device.

Yo Iwata, Tomoya Handa, Hitoshi Ishikawa, Toshiaki Goseki, Nobuyuki Shoji

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Occlusion for stimulus deprivation amblyopia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yo IwataDoctor's Program of Medical Science, Kitasato University Graduate School, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Sagamihara 252-0374, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0707-5502
Tomoya HandaDepartment of Rehabilitation, Orthoptics and Visual Science Course, School of Allied Health Sciences, Kitasato University, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Sagamihara 252-0373, Japan.
Hitoshi IshikawaDepartment of Rehabilitation, Orthoptics and Visual Science Course, School of Allied Health Sciences, Kitasato University, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Sagamihara 252-0373, Japan.
Toshiaki GosekiDepartment of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Kitasato University, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Sagamihara 252-0374, Japan.
Nobuyuki ShojiDepartment of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Kitasato University, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Sagamihara 252-0374, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8943-6924
Kitasato University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We evaluated amblyopia treatment, comparing training with glasses only and training with glasses and the Occlu-pad, a binocular open-type amblyopia training device. Forty-six children (4.8 ± 1.1 years) diagnosed with anisometropic amblyopia, all wearing complete correction glasses, were treated either with glasses only, or with glasses in combination with the Occlu-pad (training time: 2 days a week, 30 minutes per day). We compared visual acuity scores at 3 and 6 months after treatment had started, and examined the compliance rate for the Occlu-pad training. Three months as well as 6 months after amblyopia treatment started, the "Occlu-pad treatment group" showed significantly improved visual acuity, compared to the "Glasses treatment group" (at both 3 and 6 months:

Indexed as

AmblyopiaAnisometropiaChildChild, PreschoolEyeglassesFemaleHumansMaleTreatment OutcomeVision, BinocularVisual Acuity

Identifiers

PMID29670895
PMCPMC5836454
OpenAlexW2790102549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.