ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2018
Comparative study of the osteogenic potential of mesenchymal stem cells derived from different sources.
Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bioengineering extracellular vesicles: smart nanomaterials for bone regeneration.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2023Review
- Factors Influencing the Yield of Progenitor Cells in Bone Marrow Aspiration Concentrate-A Retrospective Analysis of 58 Patients.Biomedicines · 2023Article
- Mesenchymal stem cell therapy in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients: A comprehensive review of disease information and future perspectives.Iranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2023Review
- Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell's exosomes as key nanoparticles in osteogenesis and bone regeneration: specific capacity based on cell type.Molecular biology reports · 2022Review
- Overexpressed Thrombospondin 2 Induced Osteogenic Differentiation of Valve Interstitial Cells via Inhibition of Akt/NF-Disease markers · 2022Article
- Mesenchymal Stem Cell Senescence and Osteogenesis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021Review
- Are mesenchymal stem cells able to manage cytokine storm in COVID-19 patients? A review of recent studies.Regenerative therapy · 2021Review
- Modulating OPG and TGF-β1 mRNA expression via bioelectrical stimulation.Bone reports · 2021Article
- Semaphorin 3A promotes the osteogenic differentiation of rat bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in inflammatory environments by suppressing the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway.Journal of molecular histology · 2021Article
- Dental Pulp Stem Cell-Derived Secretome and Its Regenerative Potential.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- The Therapeutic Potential of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells for Regenerative Medicine: Current Knowledge and Future Understandings.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Review
- The Gingiva from the Tissue Surrounding the Bone to the Tissue Regenerating the Bone: A Systematic Review of the Osteogenic Capacity of Gingival Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Preclinical Studies.Stem cells international · 2021Review
- Impact of chitosan membrane culture on the expression of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines in mesenchymal stem cells.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2020Article
- [The application of urine derived stem cells in regeneration of musculoskeletal system].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2018Review
- Quercetin rescued TNF-alpha-induced impairments in bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell osteogenesis and improved osteoporosis in rats.American journal of translational research · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) can regenerate missing tissues and treat diseases. Hence, the current work aimed to compare the proliferation rate and the osteogenic differentiation potential of bone marrow MSCs (BMSCs), gingival MSCs (GMSCs) and submandibular MSCs (SMSCs). MATERIAL AND
methodsMSCs derived from bone marrow, gingiva and submandibular salivary gland were isolated and cultured from rats. The proliferation capacity was judged by MTT proliferation Assay. Osteogenic differentiation was assessed by Alzarin red stain and quantitative RT-PCR was performed for Runx-2 and MMP-13.
resultsThe highest significant proliferation was estimated in the BMSCs compared to GMSCs and SMSCs (
conclusionsBMSCs displayed maximum osteogenesis results followed by the GMSCs and lastly by the SGSCs. Thus, it could be recommended that GMSCs can be used as a second choice after BMSCs when bone tissue reconstruction is needed.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.