Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29670582›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2018

Boosting Alfalfa (

Ihsanullah Daur, Maged M Saad, Abdul Aziz Eida, Shakeel Ahmad, Zahid Hussain Shah, Muhammad Z Ihsan, Yasir Muhammad, Sayed S Sohrab, Heribert Hirt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Coordinated bacterial and plant sulfur metabolism inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Complete Genome Sequence ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ihsanullah DaurDepartment of Arid Land Agriculture, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Maged M SaadDesert Agriculture Initiative, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia.
Abdul Aziz EidaAgriculture Genetic Engineering Research Institute, Agriculture Research Center, Giza, Egypt.
Shakeel AhmadDepartment of Soil and Environmental Science, Muhammad Nawaz Shareef University of Agriculture, Multan, Pakistan.
Zahid Hussain ShahDepartment of Arid Land Agriculture, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Muhammad Z IhsanCholistan Institute of Desert Studies, Islamia University Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, Pakistan.
Yasir MuhammadKing Fahd Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Sayed S SohrabKing Fahd Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Heribert HirtAgriculture Genetic Engineering Research Institute, Agriculture Research Center, Giza, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study focused on rhizobacteria to promote sustainable crop production in arid regions of Saudi Arabia. The study isolated 17 tightly root-adhering rhizobacteria from various plants at Hada Al Sham in Saudi Arabia. All 17 rhizobacterial isolates were confirmed as plant growth promoting rhizobacteria by classical biochemical tests. Using 16S rDNA gene sequence analyses, the strains were identified as

Indexed as

abiotic stressbiofertilizerdesert plantsplant growth promoting rhizobacteriasustainable agriculture

Identifiers

PMID29670582
PMCPMC5893776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.