Trial reportContrast media & molecular imaging2018
Comparing the Differential Diagnostic Values of
Trial report in Contrast media & molecular imaging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Non-Invasive Procedure in Differential Diagnosis of Sarcoidosis and Tuberculosis Lymph Nodes: Radiomic Model of 18F-FDG PET-CT.Sarcoidosis, vasculitis, and diffuse lung diseases : official journal of WASOG · 2025Article
- Radionuclide-based theranostics - a promising strategy for lung cancer.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023Review
- A Comprehensive Study on the Correlation of Treatment, Diagnosis and Epidemiology of Tuberculosis and Lung Cancer.Tanaffos · 2023Review
- Preliminary Clinical Application of RGD-Containing Peptides as PET Radiotracers for Imaging Tumors.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- The aluminium-[EJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry · 2021Review
- Tumor- and Osteoblast-Derived Periostin in Prostate Cancer bone Metastases.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- A Comprehensive Review of Non-Covalent Radiofluorination Approaches Using Aluminum [Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the differential diagnostic values of Methods: Nine inflammation patients (4 tuberculosis, 3 sarcoidosis, and 2 common inflammation) and 11 lung cancer patients were included in this study. All patients underwent Results: The active tuberculosis lesions showed a high accumulation of Conclusions: The expression of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.