Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29670400›Full record

ArticleCancer management and research2018

Leilei Xia, Xiaoling Su, Jizi Shen, Qi Meng, Jiuqiong Yan, Caihong Zhang, Yu Chen, Han Wang, Mingjuan Xu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer management and research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 127 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Effect ofMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. IntegrinJournal of oncology · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. ANLN Regulated by miR-30a-5p Mediates Malignant Progression of Lung Adenocarcinoma.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2021
    Article
  20. Frontiers in immunology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Leilei Xia *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Xiaoling Su *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Jizi Shen *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Qi MengDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Jiuqiong YanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Caihong ZhangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Yu ChenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Han WangDepartment of Pathology, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Mingjuan XuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Changhai Hospital · CNSecond Military Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCervical cancer, one of the leading causes of female deaths, remains a top cause of mortality in gynecologic oncology and tends to affect younger individuals. However, the pathogenesis of cervical cancer is still far from clear. Given the high incidence and mortality of cervical cancer, uncovering the causes and pathogenesis as well as identifying novel biomarkers are of great significance and are desperately needed. MATERIALS AND

methodsFirst, raw data were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus database. The Robuse Multi-Array Average algorithm and combat function of the sva package were subsequently applied to preprocess and remove batch effects. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) analyzed with the limma package were followed by gene ontology and pathway analysis, and a protein-protein interaction (PPI) network based on the STRING website and the Cytoscape software was constructed. Weighted Correlation Network Analysis (WGCNA) was utilized to build the coexpression network. Subsequently, UALCAN websites were employed to conduct survival analysis. Finally, the oncomine database was used to validate the expression of ANLN in other datasets.

resultsGSE29570 and GSE89657, including 49 cervical cancer tissues and 20 normal cervical tissues, were screened as the datasets. Three-hundred-twenty-four DEGs were identified and, among them, 123 were upregulated, while 201 were downregulated. The DEGs PPI network complex, contained 305 nodes and 4,962 edges, and 8 clusters were calculated according to k-core =2. Among them, cluster 1, which had 65 nodes and 1,780 edges, had the highest score in these clusters. In coexpression analysis, there were 86 hubgenes from the Brown modules that were chosen for further analysis. Sixty-one key genes were identified as the intersecting genes of the Brown module of WGCNA and DEGs. In survival analysis, only ANLN was a prognostic factor, and the survival was significantly better in the low-expression ANLN group.

conclusionOur study suggested that ANLN may be a potential tumor oncogene and could serve as a biomarker for predicting the prognosis of cervical cancer patients.

Indexed as

ANLNbioinformatics analysiscervical cancerWGCNA

Identifiers

PMID29670400
PMCPMC5896649
OpenAlexW2796397026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.