ArticleInfection and drug resistance2018
Molecular epidemiology of
Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Prevalence ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022Pooled it
- Antimicrobial resistance in Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile derived from humans: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2020Pooled it
- Non-targeted metabolomics reveals metabolic signatures associated withFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Polysaccharide lyase PL3.3 possibly potentiating Clostridioides difficile clinical symptoms based on complete genome analysis of RT046/ST35 and RT012/ST54.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2025Article
- Multi-drug resistantFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
- Clinical characteristics and risk factors ofFrontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- Development and evaluation of a rapid visual loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for thePeerJ · 2024Article
- Frequency of toxin genes and antibiotic resistance pattern ofGastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench · 2021Article
- Comparative Whole Genome Sequence Analysis and Biological Features ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Characterization ofJournal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- Molecular characteristics of Clostridium difficile in children with acute gastroenteritis from Zhejiang.BMC infectious diseases · 2020Article
- Characteristics of Clostridium difficile isolates and the burden of hospital-acquired Clostridium difficile infection in a tertiary teaching hospital in Chongqing, Southwest China.BMC infectious diseases · 2020Article
- Molecular Epidemiology and Risk Factors ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020Article
- Phenotypic and Genotypic Characteristics ofInfection and drug resistance · 2020Article
- Epidemiology and virulence-associated genes ofAccess microbiology · 2020Article
- First genotypic characterization of toxigenic Clostridioides difficile in Lithuanian hospitals reveals the prevalence of the hypervirulent ribotype 027/ST1.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2019Article
- Toxin profiles and antimicrobial resistance patterns among toxigenic clinical isolates ofIranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe incidence and severity of MATERIALS AND
methodsNonrepetitive unformed fecal specimens (n=504) were investigated by the glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH),
resultsThe algorithm of combining GDH and CDAB tests could define diagnosis of 54.2% CDI cases and excluded 90% of non-CDI. Further adding the toxigenic culture to the algorithm enhanced the detection sensitivity to 100%. Toxigenic strains comprised 84.7% of isolates, including A+B+CDT- (71.8%, 61/85), A-B+CDT- (11.8%, 10/85) and A+B+CDT+ (1.2%, 1/85) isolates. RT046/ST35 (13.9%, 10/72), RT014/ST2 (12.5%, 9/72) and RT017/ST37 (12.5%, 9/72) were the more common genotypes among toxigenic
conclusionThe epidemiology of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.