ReviewAustralian prescriber2018
Pharmacovigilance and expedited drug approvals.
Review in Australian prescriber, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sex-specific adverse event profiles of PDE4 inhibitors: a comparative big-data pharmacovigilance study of apremilast, crisaborole, and roflumilast in FAERS (2004-2025).Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Descriptive analysis of the national drug adverse events (AEs) database in Lebanon.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2025Article
- Pharmacovigilance in High-Income Countries: Current Developments and a Review of Literature.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Reporting adverse drug events to the Therapeutic Goods Administration.Australian prescriber · 2021Article
- A Machine-Learning Algorithm to Optimise Automated Adverse Drug Reaction Detection from Clinical Coding.Drug safety · 2019Article
- Medication Risk Management.Innovations in pharmacy · 2019Article
- Automated adverse drug reaction detection.Australian prescriber · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.