Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29670294›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2018

The surgical intelligent knife distinguishes normal, borderline and malignant gynaecological tissues using rapid evaporative ionisation mass spectrometry (REIMS).

David L Phelps, Júlia Balog, Louise F Gildea, Zsolt Bodai, Adele Savage, Mona A El-Bahrawy, Abigail Vm Speller, Francesca Rosini, Hiromi Kudo, James S McKenzie and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04461470 (6-Month Outcomes of Pulsed Electro Resonance to Nucleotide Sources Revealing Cell Sensory Experience in Pain Relief, Stress Relief and Anti-ageing Homeostatic Restoration), which is not on this map. Cited by 55 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
20.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04461470 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

6-Month Outcomes of Pulsed Electro Resonance to Nucleotide Sources Revealing Cell Sensory Experience in Pain Relief, Stress Relief and Anti-ageing Homeostatic Restoration

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorhz ClinicRan2019 to 2024Enrolled5,000ConditionsPain, Stress, Ageing Signs, Immunity CompromiseArmsepigenetic longitudinal waves
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 154 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Metabolomics and Biomarker Discovery.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Robot-assisted biopsy sampling for online Raman spectroscopy cancer confirmation in the operating room.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

David L PhelpsImperial College, London, UK.
Júlia BalogImperial College, London, UK.
Louise F GildeaImperial College, London, UK.
Zsolt BodaiImperial College, London, UK.
Adele SavageImperial College, London, UK.
Mona A El-BahrawyImperial College, London, UK.
Abigail Vm SpellerImperial College, London, UK.
Francesca RosiniImperial College, London, UK.
Hiromi KudoImperial College, London, UK.
James S McKenzieImperial College, London, UK.
Robert BrownImperial College, London, UK.
Zoltán TakátsImperial College, London, UK. z.takats@imperial.ac.uk.
Sadaf Ghaem-MaghamiImperial College, London, UK. s.ghaem-maghami@imperial.ac.uk.
Imperial College London · GBWater Resources Research Centre · HU

Funding

Cancer Research UK 13086Cancer Research UK A16989
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurvival from ovarian cancer (OC) is improved with surgery, but surgery can be complex and tumour identification, especially for borderline ovarian tumours (BOT), is challenging. The Rapid Evaporative Ionisation Mass Spectrometric (REIMS) technique reports tissue histology in real-time by analysing aerosolised tissue during electrosurgical dissection.

methodsAerosol produced during diathermy of tissues was sampled with the REIMS interface. Histological diagnosis and mass spectra featuring complex lipid species populated a reference database on which principal component, linear discriminant and leave-one-patient-out cross-validation analyses were performed.

resultsA total of 198 patients provided 335 tissue samples, yielding 3384 spectra. Cross-validated OC classification vs separate normal tissues was high (97·4% sensitivity, 100% specificity). BOT were readily distinguishable from OC (sensitivity 90.5%, specificity 89.7%). Validation with fresh tissue lead to excellent OC detection (100% accuracy). Histological agreement between iKnife and histopathologist was very good (kappa 0.84, P < 0.001, z = 3.3). Five predominantly phosphatidic acid (PA(36:2)) and phosphatidyl-ethanolamine (PE(34:2)) lipid species were identified as being significantly more abundant in OC compared to normal tissue or BOT (P < 0.001, q < 0.001).

conclusionsThe REIMS iKnife distinguishes gynaecological tissues by analysing mass-spectrometry-derived lipidomes from tissue diathermy aerosols. Rapid intra-operative gynaecological tissue diagnosis may improve surgical care when histology is unknown, leading to personalised operations tailored to the individual.

Indexed as

ElectrosurgeryFemaleHumansLipid MetabolismLipidsMargins of ExcisionMetabolomicsMonitoring, IntraoperativeOvarian NeoplasmsPrincipal Component AnalysisSpectrometry, Mass, Electrospray IonizationLipids

Identifiers

PMID29670294
PMCPMC5959892
OpenAlexW2796448929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.