Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29670218›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

The impact of genome variation and diet on the metabolic phenotype and microbiome composition of Drosophila melanogaster.

Lisa Jehrke, Fiona A Stewart, Andrea Droste, Mathias Beller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The impact of the gut microbiome on memory and sleep inThe Journal of experimental biology · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lisa JehrkeInstitute for Mathematical Modeling of Biological Systems, Heinrich Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Fiona A StewartInstitute for Mathematical Modeling of Biological Systems, Heinrich Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Andrea DrosteInstitute for Mathematical Modeling of Biological Systems, Heinrich Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Mathias BellerInstitute for Mathematical Modeling of Biological Systems, Heinrich Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany. mathias.beller@hhu.de.ORCID 0000-0003-0987-0080

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The metabolic phenotype of an organism depends on a complex regulatory network, which integrates the plethora of intrinsic and external information and prioritizes the flow of nutrients accordingly. Given the rise of metabolic disorders including obesity, a detailed understanding of this regulatory network is in urgent need. Yet, our level of understanding is far from completeness and complicated by the discovery of additional layers in metabolic regulation, such as the impact of the microbial community present in the gut on the hosts' energy storage levels. Here, we investigate the interplay between genome variation, diet and the gut microbiome in the shaping of a metabolic phenotype. For this purpose, we reared a set of fully sequenced wild type Drosophila melanogaster flies under basal and nutritionally challenged conditions and performed metabolic and microbiome profiling experiments. Our results introduce the fly as a model system to investigate the impact of genome variation on the metabolic response to diet alterations and reveal candidate single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with different metabolic traits, as well as metabolite-metabolite and metabolite-microbe correlations. Intriguingly, the dietary changes affected the microbiome composition less than anticipated. These results challenge the current view of a rapidly changing microbiome in response to environmental fluctuations.

Indexed as

Energy MetabolismGenetic VariationGenomeMicrobiotaAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterFemaleGenetic Association StudiesGenome-Wide Association StudyMaleMetabolomeMetagenomeMetagenomicsPhenotype

Identifiers

PMID29670218
PMCPMC5906449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.