Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29670114›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Entrainment of theta, not alpha, oscillations is predictive of the brightness enhancement of a flickering stimulus.

Jennifer K Bertrand, Nathan J Wispinski, Kyle E Mathewson, Craig S Chapman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Cross-modal attentional effects of rhythmic sensory stimulation.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jennifer K BertrandFaculty of Kinesiology, Sport and Recreation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. jbertran@ualberta.ca.
Nathan J WispinskiDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Kyle E MathewsonDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Craig S ChapmanFaculty of Kinesiology, Sport and Recreation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Frequency-dependent brightness enhancement, where a flickering light can appear twice as bright as an equiluminant constant light, has been reported to exist within the alpha (8-12 Hz) band. Could oscillatory neural activity be driving this perceptual effect? Here, in two experiments, human subjects reported which of two flickering stimuli were brighter. Strikingly, 4 Hz stimuli were reported as brighter more than 80% of the time when compared to all other tested frequencies, even though all stimuli were equiluminant and of equal temporal length. Electroencephalography recordings showed that inter-trial phase coherence (ITC) of theta (4 Hz) was: (1) Significantly greater than alpha, contralateral to the flickering stimulus; (2) Enhanced by the presence of a second ipsilateral 4 Hz flickering stimulus; and (3) Uniquely lateralized, unlike the alpha band. Importantly, on trials with two identical stimuli (i.e. 4 Hz vs 4 Hz), the brightness discrimination judgment could be predicted by the hemispheric balance in the amount of 4 Hz ITC. We speculate that the theta rhythm plays a distinct information transfer role, where its ability to share information between hemispheres via entrainment promotes a better processing of visual information to inform a discrimination decision.

Indexed as

Photic StimulationTheta RhythmVisual PerceptionAdultBrainElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID29670114
PMCPMC5906697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.