Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29670075›Full record

ArticleCell death & disease2018

The novel TRAIL-receptor agonist APG350 exerts superior therapeutic activity in pancreatic cancer cells.

Karen Legler, Charlotte Hauser, Jan-Hendrik Egberts, Anna Willms, Carola Heneweer, Susann Boretius, Christoph Röcken, Claus-Christian Glüer, Thomas Becker, Michael Kluge and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell death & disease, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Pharmacological targeting of caspase-8/c-FLIPCommunications biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Knockdown ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2024
    Article
  5. Therapeutic targeting of TRAIL death receptors.Biochemical Society transactions · 2023
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Programmed Cell Death Tunes Tumor Immunity.Frontiers in immunology · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Karen LeglerInstitute for Experimental Cancer Research, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Charlotte HauserClinic for General Surgery, Visceral, Thoracic, Transplantation and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Jan-Hendrik EgbertsClinic for General Surgery, Visceral, Thoracic, Transplantation and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Anna WillmsInstitute for Experimental Cancer Research, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Carola HeneweerClinic for Diagnostic Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Susann BoretiusClinic for Diagnostic Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Christoph RöckenInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Claus-Christian GlüerSection Biomedical Imaging, Department of Diagnostic Radiology und Neuroradiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Thomas BeckerClinic for General Surgery, Visceral, Thoracic, Transplantation and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Michael KlugeAPOGENIX AG, Im Neuenheimer Feld 584, Heidelberg, Germany.
Oliver HillAPOGENIX AG, Im Neuenheimer Feld 584, Heidelberg, Germany.
Christian GieffersAPOGENIX AG, Im Neuenheimer Feld 584, Heidelberg, Germany.
Harald FrickeAPOGENIX AG, Im Neuenheimer Feld 584, Heidelberg, Germany.
Holger KalthoffInstitute for Experimental Cancer Research, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Johannes LemkeClinic of General and Visceral Surgery, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Anna TrauzoldInstitute for Experimental Cancer Research, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany. atrauzold@email.uni-kiel.de.
University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DEApogenix (Germany) · DEKiel University · DEUniversity of Lübeck · DEAffimed Therapeutics (Germany) · DEGerman Primate Center · DEUniversity Hospital Ulm · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) has raised attention as a novel anticancer therapeutic as it induces apoptosis preferentially in tumor cells. However, first-generation TRAIL-receptor agonists (TRAs), comprising recombinant TRAIL and agonistic receptor-specific antibodies, have not demonstrated anticancer activity in clinical studies. In fact, cancer cells are often resistant to conventional TRAs. Therefore, in addition to TRAIL-sensitizing strategies, next-generation TRAs with superior apoptotic activity are warranted. APG350 is a novel, highly potent TRAIL-receptor agonist with a hexavalent binding mode allowing the clustering of six TRAIL-receptors per drug molecule. Here we report on preclinical in vitro and in vivo studies testing the activity of APG350 on pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) cells. We found that APG350 potently induced apoptosis of Colo357, PancTuI and Panc89 cells in vitro. In addition, APG350 treatment activated non-canonical TRAIL signaling pathways (MAPK, p38, JNK, ERK1/ERK2 and NF-κB) and induced the secretion of IL-8. Stable overexpression of Bcl-xL inhibited APG350-induced cell death and augmented activation of non-canonical pathways. Intriguingly, pre-treatment of Bcl-xL-overexpressing cells with the BH3-mimic Navitoclax restored their sensitivity to APG350. To study the effects of APG350 on PDAC cells in vivo, we applied two different orthotopic xenotransplantation mouse models, with and without primary tumor resection, representing adjuvant and palliative treatment regimes, respectively. APG350 treatment of established tumors (palliative treatment) significantly reduced tumor burden. These effects, however, were not seen in tumors with enforced overexpression of Bcl-xL. Upon primary tumor resection and subsequent APG350 treatment (adjuvant therapy), APG350 limited recurrent tumor growth and metastases. Importantly, therapeutic efficacy of APG350 treatment was more effective compared with treatment with soluble TRAIL in both models. In conclusion, APG350 represents a promising next-generation TRA for the treatment of PDAC. Moreover, our results suggest that combining APG350 with Navitoclax might be a succesfull strategy for cancers harboring mitochondrial apoptosis resistance.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalNeoplasm ProteinsPancreatic NeoplasmsTNF-Related Apoptosis-Inducing LigandAnimalsCell Line, TumorFemaleHumansMiceMice, SCIDRecombinant Fusion ProteinsXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysAPG350Neoplasm ProteinsRecombinant Fusion ProteinsTNF-Related Apoptosis-Inducing LigandTNFSF10 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID29670075
PMCPMC5906476
OpenAlexW2799281825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.