Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29669703›Full record

ReviewJournal of medical Internet research2018

Physical Activity, Sedentary Behavior, and Diet-Related eHealth and mHealth Research: Bibliometric Analysis.

Andre Matthias Müller, Carol A Maher, Corneel Vandelanotte, Melanie Hingle, Anouk Middelweerd, Michael L Lopez, Ann DeSmet, Camille E Short, Nicole Nathan, Melinda J Hutchesson and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of medical Internet research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed, 12 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Andre Matthias MüllerDomain: Health Systems & Behavioural Sciences, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Healh, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-5770-6723
Carol A MaherSchool of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8676-0224
Corneel VandelanottePhysical Activity Research Group, School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4445-8094
Melanie HingleDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6696-5601
Anouk MiddelweerdEMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1274-968X
Michael L LopezTexas A&M AgriLife Extension Service, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9416-0990
Ann DeSmetDepartment of Movement and Sports Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-7473-140X
Camille E ShortFreemasons Foundation Centre for Men's Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4177-4251
Nicole NathanPriority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle Australia, Newcastle, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7726-1714
Melinda J HutchessonPriority Research Centre in Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Health Sciences, The University of Newcastle Australia, Newcastle, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1851-0661
Louise PoppeDepartment of Movement and Sports Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9285-6962
Catherine B WoodsDepartment of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-0892-6591
Susan L WilliamsPhysical Activity Research Group, School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4289-9248
Petra A WarkCentre for Innovative Research Across the Life Course, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Coventry University, Coventry, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1020-4640

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElectronic health (eHealth) and mobile health (mHealth) approaches to address low physical activity levels, sedentary behavior, and unhealthy diets have received significant research attention. However, attempts to systematically map the entirety of the research field are lacking. This gap can be filled with a bibliometric study, where publication-specific data such as citations, journals, authors, and keywords are used to provide a systematic overview of a specific field. Such analyses will help researchers better position their work.

objectiveThe objective of this review was to use bibliometric data to provide an overview of the eHealth and mHealth research field related to physical activity, sedentary behavior, and diet.

methodsThe Web of Science (WoS) Core Collection was searched to retrieve all existing and highly cited (as defined by WoS) physical activity, sedentary behavior, and diet related eHealth and mHealth research papers published in English between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2016. Retrieved titles were screened for eligibility, using the abstract and full-text where needed. We described publication trends over time, which included journals, authors, and countries of eligible papers, as well as their keywords and subject categories. Citations of eligible papers were compared with those expected based on published data. Additionally, we described highly-cited papers of the field (ie, top ranked 1%).

resultsThe search identified 4805 hits, of which 1712 (including 42 highly-cited papers) were included in the analyses. Publication output increased on an average of 26% per year since 2000, with 49.00% (839/1712) of papers being published between 2014 and 2016. Overall and throughout the years, eHealth and mHealth papers related to physical activity, sedentary behavior, and diet received more citations than expected compared with papers in the same WoS subject categories. The Journal of Medical Internet Research published most papers in the field (9.58%, 164/1712). Most papers originated from high-income countries (96.90%, 1659/1717), in particular the United States (48.83%, 836/1712). Most papers were trials and studied physical activity. Beginning in 2013, research on Generation 2 technologies (eg, smartphones, wearables) sharply increased, while research on Generation 1 (eg, text messages) technologies increased at a reduced pace. Reviews accounted for 20 of the 42 highly-cited papers (n=19 systematic reviews). Social media, smartphone apps, and wearable activity trackers used to encourage physical activity, less sedentary behavior, and/or healthy eating were the focus of 14 highly-cited papers.

conclusionsThis study highlighted the rapid growth of the eHealth and mHealth physical activity, sedentary behavior, and diet research field, emphasized the sizeable contribution of research from high-income countries, and pointed to the increased research interest in Generation 2 technologies. It is expected that the field will grow and diversify further and that reviews and research on most recent technologies will continue to strongly impact the field.

Indexed as

BibliometricsDietDiet, HealthyExerciseHumansInternetSedentary BehaviorTelemedicineexercisefoodhealth behaviorhealth resourcesInternetmovementpublicationssciencetelemedicinetrends

Identifiers

PMID29669703
PMCPMC5932335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.