Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29669529›Full record

Trial reportBMC cancer2018

Improving quality of life through the routine use of the patient concerns inventory for head and neck cancer patients: a cluster preference randomized controlled trial.

Simon N Rogers, Derek Lowe, Cher Lowies, Seow Tien Yeo, Christine Allmark, Dominic Mcavery, Gerald M Humphris, Robert Flavel, Cherith Semple, Steven J Thomas and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03086629 (Improving Quality of Life Through the Routine Use of the Patient Concerns Inventory for Head and Neck Cancer Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03086629 nacompletednot on this map

Improving Quality of Life Through the Routine Use of the Patient Concerns Inventory for Head and Neck Cancer Patients (PCI-QoL)

TypeinterventionalSponsorLiverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustRan2017 to 2020Enrolled416ConditionsCancer of Head and NeckArmsPatient Concerns Inventory, No Patient Concerns Inventory
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Improving quality of life through the routine use of the patient concerns inventory for head and neck cancer patients: main results of a cluster preference randomised controlled trial.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2021
    Trial
  5. Improving quality of life through the routine use of the patient concerns inventory for head and neck cancer patients: baseline results in a cluster preference randomised controlled trial.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2020
    Trial
  6. Concerns raised by people treated for head and neck cancer: a secondary analysis of audiotaped consultations in a health services follow-up clinic.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Patient Concerns Inventory in head and neck oncology: a structured review of its development, validation and clinical implications.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The (head and neck) carcinologic handicap index: validation of a modular type questionnaire and its ability to prioritise patients' needs.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2021
    Article
  14. What are the underlying reasons behind socioeconomic differences in doctor-patient communication in head and neck oncology review clinics?Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Quality of life, cognitive, physical and emotional function at diagnosis predicts head and neck cancer survival: analysis of cases from the Head and Neck 5000 study.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Simon N RogersRegional Maxillofacial Unit, University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, UK. simonn.rogers@aintree.nhs.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-5989-6142
Derek LoweRegional Maxillofacial Unit, University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, UK.
Cher LowiesHead and Neck Clinical Trials, University Hospital Aintree, Clinical Sciences Building, Liverpool, UK.
Seow Tien YeoCentre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation (CHEME), School of Healthcare Sciences, College of Health and Behavioural Sciences (CoHaBS), Bangor University, Ardudwy Building, Normal Site, Bangor, UK.
Christine AllmarkLeeds Teaching Hospitals and St James Institute of Oncology, Leeds Dental Institute and Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK.
Dominic McaveryRegional Maxillofacial Unit, University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, UK.
Gerald M HumphrisSchool of Medicine, Medical & Biological Sciences, North Haugh, St Andrews, UK.
Robert FlavelSouthway, Guildford, Surrey, UK.
Cherith SempleMacmillan Health and Wellbeing Service, Ulster Hospital, Upper Newtownards Road, Dundonald, Belfast, UK.
Steven J ThomasOral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, University, Bristol, Lower Maudlin Street, Bristol, UK.
Anastasios KanatasLeeds Teaching Hospitals and St James Institute of Oncology, Leeds Dental Institute and Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK.

Funding

Department of Health PB-PG-0215-36047National Institute for Health Research PB-PG-0215-36047
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe consequences of treatment for Head and Neck cancer (HNC) patients has profound detrimental impacts such as impaired QOL, emotional distress, delayed recovery and frequent use of healthcare. The aim of this trial is to determine if the routine use of the Patients Concerns Inventory (PCI) package in review clinics during the first year following treatment can improve overall quality of life, reduce the social-emotional impact of cancer and reduce levels of distress. Furthermore, we aim to describe the economic costs and benefits of using the PCI.

methodsThis will be a cluster preference randomised control trial with consultants either 'using' or 'not using' the PCI package at clinic. It will involve two centres Leeds and Liverpool. 416 eligible patients from at least 10 consultant clusters are required to show a clinically meaningful difference in the primary outcome. The primary outcome is the percentage of participants with less than good overall quality of life at the final one-year clinic as measured by the University of Washington QOL questionnaire version 4 (UWQOLv4). Secondary outcomes at one-year are the mean social-emotional subscale (UWQOLv4) score, Distress Thermometer (DT) score ≥ 4, and key health economic measures (QALY-EQ-5D-5 L; CSRI). DISCUSSION: This trial will provide knowledge on the effectiveness of a consultation intervention package based around the PCI used at routine follow-up clinics following treatment of head and neck cancer with curative intent. If this intervention is (cost) effective for patients, the next step will be to promote wider use of this approach as standard care in clinical practice.

trial registration32,382. Clinical Trials Identifier, NCT03086629 . PROTOCOL: Version 3.0, 1st July 2017.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeCost-Benefit AnalysisEmotionsHead and Neck NeoplasmsHealth Care CostsHumansQuality Assurance, Health CareStress, PsychologicalHead and neck CancerInterventionPatient concerns inventoryPatient reported outcomesQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID29669529
PMCPMC5907378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.