Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29669527›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2018

'I didn't think you were allowed that, they didn't mention that.' A qualitative study exploring women's perceptions of home birth.

Jo Naylor Smith, Beck Taylor, Karen Shaw, Alistair Hewison, Sara Kenyon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Planned Home Birth in Low-Risk Pregnancies in Spain: A Descriptive Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jo Naylor SmithCare Quality Commission, Citygate, Gallowgate, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 4PA, England, UK.
Beck TaylorInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, England, UK. r.taylor.3@bham.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-3559-7922
Karen ShawInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, England, UK.
Alistair HewisonInstitute of Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, England, UK.
Sara KenyonInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, England, UK.
University of Birmingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence suggests that home birth is as safe as hospital birth for low risk multiparous women, and is associated with reduced intervention rates and increased rates of normal birth. However the home birth rate in the UK is low, and few women choose this option. The aims of this study were to identify what influences multiparous women's choice of birth place, and to explore their views of home birth.

methodsFive focus groups were conducted with multiparous women (n = 28) attending mother and baby groups in a city in the UK with a diverse multi-ethnic population. Data were analysed thematically using the Framework Method, combining deductive and inductive approaches to the data.

resultsSeveral themes were developed from the data, these were: the expectation that birth would take place in an Obstetric Unit; perceptions of birth as a 'natural' event; lack of knowledge of what home birth looked like; and a lack of confidence in the reliability of the maternity service. Two themes emerged regarding the influences on women's choices: clear information provision, particularly for those from ethnic minority groups, and the role of health care professionals. A final theme concerned women's responses to the offer of choice.

conclusionsThere are gaps in women's knowledge about the reality and practicalities of giving birth at home that have not been previously identified. Other findings are consistent with existing evidence, suggesting that many women still do not receive consistent, comprehensive information about home birth. The findings from this research can be used to develop approaches to meet women's information and support needs, and facilitate genuine choice of place of birth.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdolescentAdultChoice BehaviorDelivery, ObstetricEthnicityFemaleFocus GroupsHome ChildbirthHumansMothersParityPerceptionPregnancyQualitative ResearchUnited KingdomChoice behaviourDeliveryHome childbirthMaternal behaviourMidwiferyObstetricPatient satisfactionPersonal AutonomyPregnancyPrenatal care

Identifiers

PMID29669527
PMCPMC5907292
OpenAlexW2805949820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.