Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29669405›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health perspectives2018

Projecting Age-Stratified Risk of Exposure to Inland Flooding and Wildfire Smoke in the United States under Two Climate Scenarios.

David Mills, Russell Jones, Cameron Wobus, Julia Ekstrom, Lesley Jantarasami, Alexis St Juliana, Allison Crimmins

Erratum issuedOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health perspectives, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Wildfires and Older Adults: A Scoping Review of Impacts, Risks, and Interventions.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  5. Tripling of western US particulate pollution from wildfires in a warming climate.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

David MillsAbt Associates, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
Russell JonesAbt Associates, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
Cameron WobusAbt Associates, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
Julia EkstromPolicy Institute for Energy, Environment and the Economy, University of California, Davis, California, USA.
Lesley JantarasamiOregon Department of Energy, Salem, Oregon, USA.
Alexis St JulianaAbt Associates, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
Allison CrimminsU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA.
Abt Global (United States) · USEnvironmental Protection Agency · USUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe public health community readily recognizes flooding and wildfires as climate-related health hazards, but few studies quantify changes in risk of exposure, particularly for vulnerable children and older adults.

objectivesThis study quantifies future populations potentially exposed to inland flooding and wildfire smoke under two climate scenarios, highlighting the populations in particularly vulnerable age groups (≤4 y old and ≥65 y old).

methodsSpatially explicit projections of inland flooding and wildfire under two representative concentration pathways (RCP8.5 and RCP4.5) are integrated with static (2010) and dynamic (2050 and 2090) age-stratified projections of future contiguous U.S. populations at the county level.

resultsIn both 2050 and 2090, an additional one-third of the population will live in areas affected by larger and more frequent inland flooding under RCP8.5 than under RCP4.5. Approximately 15 million children and 25 million older adults could avoid this increased risk of flood exposure each year by 2090 under a moderate mitigation scenario (RCP4.5 compared with RCP8.5). We also find reduced exposure to wildfire smoke under the moderate mitigation scenario. Nearly 1 million young children and 1.7 million older adults would avoid exposure to wildfire smoke each year under RCP4.5 than under RCP8.5 by the end of the century.

conclusionsBy integrating climate-driven hazard and population projections, newly created county-level exposure maps identify locations of potential significant future public health risk. These potential exposure results can help inform actions to prevent and prepare for associated future adverse health outcomes, particularly for vulnerable children and older adults. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP2594.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeFloodsWildfiresAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsChildChild, PreschoolEnvironmental ExposureHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMiddle AgedPublic HealthSmoke

Identifiers

PMID29669405
PMCPMC6071806
OpenAlexW2800861573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.