ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2018
A Twitter-based survey on marijuana concentrate use.
Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Social media recruitment for mental health research: A systematic review.Comprehensive psychiatry · 2020Pooled it
- Effects of Marijuana Use on Smokers Switching to E-Cigarettes in a Randomized Clinical Trial.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2022Trial
- Extending Gender- and Sex-Based Analyses in Cannabis Research: Findings from an Online Sample of Gender Diverse Young Adult Consumers.Cannabis and cannabinoid research · 2024Article
- Article
- Twitter activity surrounding the Finnish green party's cannabis legalisation proposal: A mixed-methods analysis.Nordisk alkohol- & narkotikatidskrift : NAT · 2023Article
- Changes in Quantity Measures of Various Forms of Cannabis Consumption among Emerging Adults in Canada in Relation to Policy and Public Health Developments.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Adult use of highly-potent Δ9-THC cannabis concentrate products by U.S. state cannabis legalization status, 2021.Addictive behaviors · 2023Article
- Cannabis Use in Physicians: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Medicines (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Assessing Barriers to Implementation of Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence-Based Tools in Critical Care: Web-Based Survey Study.JMIR perioperative medicine · 2023Article
- Trends and Socio-Demographic Differences of Cannabis Vaping in the USA and Canada.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Thinking Aloud or Screaming Inside: Exploratory Study of Sentiment Around Work.JMIR formative research · 2022Article
- Therapeutic Claims in Cannabidiol (CBD) Marketing Messages on Twitter.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine · 2021Article
- Use of highly-potent cannabis concentrate products: More common in U.S. states with recreational or medical cannabis laws.Drug and alcohol dependence · 2021Article
- Geographic Differences in Cannabis Conversations on Twitter: Infodemiology Study.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2020Article
- Gender Norms, Roles and Relations and Cannabis-Use Patterns: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Sex and Gender Interactions on the Use and Impact of Recreational Cannabis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Review
- Interpol review of controlled substances 2016-2019.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2020Review
- Age related differences in cannabis use and subjective effects in a large population-based survey of adult athletes.Journal of cannabis research · 2019Article
- Butane hash oil and dabbing: insights into use, amateur production techniques, and potential harm mitigation.Substance abuse and rehabilitation · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsThe purpose of this paper is to analyze characteristics of marijuana concentrate users, describe patterns and reasons of use, and identify factors associated with daily use of concentrates among U.S.-based cannabis users recruited via a Twitter-based online survey.
methodsAn anonymous Web-based survey was conducted in June 2017 with 687 U.S.-based cannabis users recruited via Twitter-based ads. The survey included questions about state of residence, socio-demographic characteristics, and cannabis use including marijuana concentrates. Multiple logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify characteristics associated with lifetime and daily use of marijuana concentrates.
resultsAlmost 60% of respondents were male, 86% were white, and the mean age was 43.0 years. About 48% reported marijuana concentrate use. After adjusting for multiple testing, significant predictors of concentrate use included: living in "recreational" (AOR = 2.04; adj. p = .042) or "medical, less restrictive" (AOR = 1.74; adj. p = .030) states, being younger (AOR = 0.97, adj. p = .008), and daily herbal cannabis use (AOR = 2.57, adj. p = .008). Out of 329 marijuana concentrate users, about 13% (n = 44) reported daily/near daily use. Significant predictors of daily concentrate use included: living in recreational states (AOR = 3.59, adj. p = .020) and using concentrates for therapeutic purposes (AOR = 4.34, adj. p = .020).
conclusionsLiving in states with more liberal marijuana policies is associated with greater likelihood of marijuana concentrate use and with more frequent use. Characteristics of daily users, in particular, patterns of therapeutic use warrant further research with community-recruited samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.