Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29669191›Full record

ArticleArthritis care & research2019

Perspectives of Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients on Electronic Communication and Patient-Reported Outcome Data Collection: A Qualitative Study.

Iris Navarro-Millán, Anne Zinski, Sally Shurbaji, Bernadette Johnson, Liana Fraenkel, James Willig, Maria I Danila, Huifeng Yun, Jeffrey R Curtis, Monika M Safford

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis care & research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Future challenges in rheumatology - is telemedicine the solution?Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2022
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Iris Navarro-MillánWeill Cornell Medical College and the Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-9540-6614
Anne ZinskiUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham.
Sally ShurbajiUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham.
Bernadette JohnsonUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham.
Liana FraenkelYale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
James WilligUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham.
Maria I DanilaUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham.
Huifeng YunUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham.
Jeffrey R CurtisUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham.ORCID 0000-0002-8907-8976
Monika M SaffordWeill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.

Funding

Improving Decision Making in Patients with Rheumatic DiseaseK24AR060231 · NIAMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI FRAENKEL, LIANA · 2011 to 2018
$1.2M
Optimization of hyperlipidemia management among patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A patient-centered intervention developmentK23AR068449 · NIAMS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI NAVARRO-MILLÁN, IRIS Y · 2017 to 2022
$1.0M
NIAMS NIH HHS K23 AR068449NIAMS NIH HHS K24 AR060231PfizerRheumatology Research Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify the perspectives of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) on electronic recording of between-visit disease activity and other patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and on sharing this information with health care providers or peers.

methodsPatients with RA were recruited to participate in focus groups from December 2014 to April 2015. The topic guide and analysis were based on the Andersen-Newman framework. Sessions were audiorecorded, transcribed, independently coded, and analyzed for themes.

resultsThirty-one patients participated in 7 focus groups. Their mean ± SD age was 51 ± 13.1 years, 94% were women, 52% were African American, 11% were Hispanic, and 37% were white. Three themes emerged: provider communication, information-seeking about RA, and social and peer support. Participants expressed a willingness to track disease activity data to share with health care providers electronically if providers would act on the information. Participants envisioned symptom tracking and information sharing as a mechanism to relay and obtain reliable information about RA. Participants were also interested in electronic communication between visits if it facilitated learning about symptom management and enhanced opportunities for social support among patients with RA.

conclusionPatients with RA may be amenable to electronic collection and sharing of PRO-type data between clinical encounters if it facilitates communication with health care providers and provides access to reliable information about RA. Providing patients with social support was important for enhancing PROs collection by helping them overcome barriers by using electronic devices and overcome reservations about the value of these data.

Indexed as

CommunicationPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresQualitative ResearchAdultAgedAged, 80 and overArthritis, RheumatoidData CollectionFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID29669191
PMCPMC6388703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.