Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29669094›Full record

ArticleToxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology2018

Hydroxylated-Graphene Quantum Dots Induce DNA Damage and Disrupt Microtubule Structure in Human Esophageal Epithelial Cells.

Ming Li, Meng-Meng Gu, Xin Tian, Bei-Bei Xiao, Siyuan Lu, Wei Zhu, Lan Yu, Zeng-Fu Shang

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Therapeutic Potential of Graphene Quantum Dots on Pterygium Cells.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ming LiState Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Department of Radiobiology, School of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, People's Republic of China.
Meng-Meng GuState Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Department of Radiobiology, School of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, People's Republic of China.
Xin TianState Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Department of Radiobiology, School of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, People's Republic of China.
Bei-Bei XiaoState Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Department of Radiobiology, School of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, People's Republic of China.
Siyuan LuState Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Department of Radiobiology, School of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, People's Republic of China.
Wei ZhuState Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Department of Radiobiology, School of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, People's Republic of China.
Lan YuSuzhou Digestive Diseases and Nutrition Research Center, Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Suzhou Hospital, North District of Suzhou Municipal Hospital, Suzhou 215000, People's Republic of China.
Zeng-Fu ShangState Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Department of Radiobiology, School of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, People's Republic of China.
Soochow University · CNSuzhou Municipal Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Graphene quantum dots (GQDs) have attracted significant interests due to their unique chemical and physical properties. In this study, we investigated the potential effects of hydroxyl-modified GQDs (OH-GQDs) on the human esophageal epithelial cell line HET-1A. Our data revealed significant cytotoxicity of OH-GQDs which decreased the viability of HET-1A in a dose and time-dependent manner. The moderate concentration (25 or 50 µg/ml) of OH-GQDs significantly blocked HET-1A cells in G0/G1 cell cycle phase. An increased percentage of γH2AX-positive and genomically unstable cells were also detected in cells treated with different doses of OH-GQDs (25, 50, and 100 µg/ml). Microarray data revealed that OH-GQDs treatment down-regulated genes related to DNA damage repair, cell cycle regulation and cytoskeleton signal pathways indicating a novel role of OH-GQDs. Consistent with the microarray data, OH-GQDs disrupted microtubule structure and inhibited microtubule regrowth around centrosomes in HET-1A cells. In conclusion, our findings provide important evidence for considering the application of OH-GQDs in biomedical fields.

Indexed as

DNA DamageCell CycleCell LineCell SurvivalDNA RepairDose-Response Relationship, DrugDown-RegulationEpithelial CellsEsophagusGene Expression RegulationGraphiteHumansHydroxylationMicrotubulesQuantum DotsTime FactorsGraphite

Identifiers

PMID29669094
PMCPMC6016703
OpenAlexW2801564629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.