Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29669084›Full record

ReviewPhysical therapy2018

Advancing Psychologically Informed Practice for Patients With Persistent Musculoskeletal Pain: Promise, Pitfalls, and Solutions.

Francis J Keefe, Chris J Main, Steven Z George

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Physical therapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Hypnotic Enhancement of Virtual Reality Distraction Analgesia during Thermal Pain:The International journal of clinical and experimental hypnosis
    Trial
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. 'The Second Arrow': A Collaborative Autoethnographic Exploration of What Can Be Learned From One Long COVID Journey.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Francis J KeefePain Prevention and Treatment Research Program, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708-0187 (USA).
Chris J MainResearch Institute for Primary Care & Health Sciences, Keele University, North Staffordshire, United Kingdom.
Steven Z GeorgeDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, and Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina. Dr George is a Catherine Worthingham Fellow of the American Physical Therapy Association.

Funding

Biopsychosocial Influence on Shoulder PainR01AR055899 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI GEORGE, STEVEN Z · 2008 to 2020
$5.5M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR055899
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There has been growing interest in psychologically oriented pain management over the past 3 to 4 decades, including a 2011 description of psychologically informed practice (PIP) for low back pain. PIP requires a broader focus than traditional biomechanical and pathology-based approaches that have been traditionally used to manage musculoskeletal pain. A major focus of PIP is addressing the behavioral aspects of pain (ie, peoples' responses to pain) by identifying individual expectations, beliefs, and feelings as prognostic factors for clinical and occupational outcomes indicating progression to chronicity. Since 2011, the interest in PIP seems to be growing, as evidenced by its use in large trials, inclusion in scientific conferences, increasing evidence base, and expansion to other musculoskeletal pain conditions. Primary care physicians and physical therapists have delivered PIP as part of a stratified care approach involving screening and targeting of treatment for people at high risk for continued pain-associated disability. Furthermore, PIP is consistent with recent national priorities emphasizing nonpharmacological pain management options. In this perspective, PIP techniques that range in complexity are described, considerations for implementation in clinical practice are offered, and future directions that will advance the understanding of PIP are outlined.

Indexed as

Physical Therapy ModalitiesDisability EvaluationHumansMusculoskeletal PainPain ManagementPain MeasurementPsychophysiologyPsychotherapyRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID29669084
PMCPMC7207297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.