Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29668815›Full record

ArticleRevista de saude publica2018

The physician in the face of death in the emergency room.

Janaína de Souza Aredes, Karla Cristina Giacomin, Josélia Oliveira Araújo Firmo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista de saude publica, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Janaína de Souza AredesInstituto René Rachou, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.
Karla Cristina GiacominSecretaria Municipal de Saúde de Belo Horizonte, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.
Josélia Oliveira Araújo FirmoInstituto René Rachou, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo analyze how physicians, as part of a sociocultural group, handle the different types of death, in a metropolitan emergency service.

methodsThis is an ethnography carried out in one of the largest emergency services in Latin America. We have collected the data for nine months with participant observation and interviews with 43 physicians of different specialties - 25 men and 18 women, aged between 28 and 69 years.

resultsThe analysis, guided by the model of Signs, Meanings, and Actions, shows a vast mosaic of situations and issues that permeate the medical care in an emergency unit. The results indicate that physicians may consider one death more difficult than another, depending on the criteria: age, identification or not with the patient, circumstances of the death, and medical questioning as to their responsibility in the death process.

conclusionsFor physicians, no death is easy. Each death can be more or less difficult, depending on different criteria that permeate the medical care in an emergency unit, and it reveals different social, ethical, and moral issues.

Indexed as

Attitude to DeathEmergency Service, HospitalAdultAgedAnthropology, MedicalBrazilFemaleHumansMaleMedical Staff, HospitalMiddle AgedMoralsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID29668815
PMCPMC5947463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.