ArticlePloS one2018
Data quality of whole genome bisulfite sequencing on Illumina platforms.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Androgen receptor imprints satellite cell stemness and preserves their reservoir for lifelong regeneration and optimal repair.Science advances · 2026Article
- Article
- Quercetin alleviates CClBiochemistry and biophysics reports · 2026Article
- Mucosal DNA methylation reveals immune-related methylation profile and correlates with crohn's disease status.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Evaluation of Illumina and Oxford Nanopore Sequencing for the Study of DNA Methylation in Alzheimer's Disease and Frontotemporal Dementia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Spatiotemporal DNA methylation dynamics shape megabase-scale methylome landscapes.Life science alliance · 2024Article
- Clinical, genetic and structural delineation of RPL13-related spondyloepimetaphyseal dysplasia suggest extra-ribosomal functions of eL13.NPJ genomic medicine · 2023Article
- Cross-platform comparisons for targeted bisulfite sequencing of MGISEQ-2000 and NovaSeq6000.Clinical epigenetics · 2023Article
- Systematic evaluation of library preparation methods and sequencing platforms for high-throughput whole genome bisulfite sequencing.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Whole-genome bisulfite sequencing with improved accuracy and cost.Genome research · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The powerful HiSeq X sequencers with their patterned flowcell technology and fast turnaround times are instrumental for many large-scale genomic and epigenomic studies. However, assessment of DNA methylation by sodium bisulfite treatment results in sequencing libraries of low diversity, which may impact data quality and yield. In this report we assess the quality of WGBS data generated on the HiSeq X system in comparison with data generated on the HiSeq 2500 system and the newly released NovaSeq system. We report a systematic issue with low basecall quality scores assigned to guanines in the second read of WGBS when using certain Real Time Analysis (RTA) software versions on the HiSeq X sequencer, reminiscent of an issue that was previously reported with certain HiSeq 2500 software versions. However, with the HD.3.4.0 /RTA 2.7.7 software upgrade for the HiSeq X system, we observed an overall improved quality and yield of the WGBS data generated, which in turn empowers cost-effective and high quality DNA methylation studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.