Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29668691›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

The impact of routine data quality assessments on electronic medical record data quality in Kenya.

Veronica Muthee, Aaron F Bochner, Allison Osterman, Nzisa Liku, Willis Akhwale, James Kwach, Mehta Prachi, Joyce Wamicwe, Jacob Odhiambo, Fredrick Onyango and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Electronic health record data quality assessment and tools: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Digital Health Data Quality Issues: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Veronica MutheeInternational Training and Education Center for Health (I-TECH), Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0003-4962-8029
Aaron F BochnerInternational Training and Education Center for Health (I-TECH), Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Allison OstermanDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Nzisa LikuInternational Training and Education Center for Health (I-TECH), Nairobi, Kenya.
Willis AkhwaleInternational Training and Education Center for Health (I-TECH), Nairobi, Kenya.
James KwachU.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Nairobi, Kenya.
Mehta PrachiU.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Nairobi, Kenya.
Joyce WamicweNational AIDS and STI Control Programme, Ministry of Health, Nairobi, Kenya.
Jacob OdhiamboNational AIDS and STI Control Programme, Ministry of Health, Nairobi, Kenya.
Fredrick OnyangoElizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation (EGPAF), Nairobi, Kenya.
Nancy PuttkammerInternational Training and Education Center for Health (I-TECH), Seattle, WA, United States of America.

Funding

University of Washington/Fred Hutch Center for AIDS ResearchP30AI027757 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Kenneth Sherr · 1988 to 2026
$104.9M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI027757NIH HHS AI027757NIH HHS U91HA06801
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRoutine Data Quality Assessments (RDQAs) were developed to measure and improve facility-level electronic medical record (EMR) data quality. We assessed if RDQAs were associated with improvements in data quality in KenyaEMR, an HIV care and treatment EMR used at 341 facilities in Kenya.

methodsRDQAs assess data quality by comparing information recorded in paper records to KenyaEMR. RDQAs are conducted during a one-day site visit, where approximately 100 records are randomly selected and 24 data elements are reviewed to assess data completeness and concordance. Results are immediately provided to facility staff and action plans are developed for data quality improvement. For facilities that had received more than one RDQA (baseline and follow-up), we used generalized estimating equation models to determine if data completeness or concordance improved from the baseline to the follow-up RDQAs.

results27 facilities received two RDQAs and were included in the analysis, with 2369 and 2355 records reviewed from baseline and follow-up RDQAs, respectively. The frequency of missing data in KenyaEMR declined from the baseline (31% missing) to the follow-up (13% missing) RDQAs. After adjusting for facility characteristics, records from follow-up RDQAs had 0.43-times the risk (95% CI: 0.32-0.58) of having at least one missing value among nine required data elements compared to records from baseline RDQAs. Using a scale with one point awarded for each of 20 data elements with concordant values in paper records and KenyaEMR, we found that data concordance improved from baseline (11.9/20) to follow-up (13.6/20) RDQAs, with the mean concordance score increasing by 1.79 (95% CI: 0.25-3.33).

conclusionsThis manuscript demonstrates that RDQAs can be implemented on a large scale and used to identify EMR data quality problems. RDQAs were associated with meaningful improvements in data quality and could be adapted for implementation in other settings.

Indexed as

Data AccuracyElectronic Health RecordsHIV InfectionsHumansKenyaQuality Control

Identifiers

PMID29668691
PMCPMC5905951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.