Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29668671›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2018

Propagating annotations of molecular networks using in silico fragmentation.

Ricardo R da Silva, Mingxun Wang, Louis-Félix Nothias, Justin J J van der Hooft, Andrés Mauricio Caraballo-Rodríguez, Evan Fox, Marcy J Balunas, Jonathan L Klassen, Norberto Peporine Lopes, Pieter C Dorrestein

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 158 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
158citing papers in PubMed
13.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

158 citing papers in PubMed, 363 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Bioactivity-guided metabolomics reveals discriminant cytotoxic signatures in Siparuna guianensis.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Large-Scale Metabolite Annotation in Untargeted Metabolomics Using MetDNA.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

98 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Ricardo R da SilvaCollaborative Mass Spectrometry Innovation Center, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States of America.
Mingxun WangCollaborative Mass Spectrometry Innovation Center, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States of America.
Louis-Félix NothiasCollaborative Mass Spectrometry Innovation Center, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6711-6719
Justin J J van der HooftCollaborative Mass Spectrometry Innovation Center, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9340-5511
Andrés Mauricio Caraballo-RodríguezCollaborative Mass Spectrometry Innovation Center, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5499-2728
Evan FoxDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States of America.
Marcy J BalunasDivision of Medicinal Chemistry, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States of America.
Jonathan L KlassenDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States of America.
Norberto Peporine LopesNPPNS, Department of Physic and Chemistry, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8159-3658
Pieter C DorresteinCollaborative Mass Spectrometry Innovation Center, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States of America.
University of California San Diego · USUniversity of Connecticut · USUniversidade de Ribeirão Preto · BR

Funding

TrainingP41GM103484 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI PEVZNER, PAVEL A · 2012 to 2018
$8.7M
Unified Computation Tools for Natural Products ResearchR01GM107550 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI COTTRELL, GARRISON W, GERWICK, WILLIAM HENRY · 2013 to 2025
$8.2M
Synapt ion mobility mass spectrometerS10RR029121 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI DORRESTEIN, PIETER C · 2011 to 2011
$802k
Reuse of Public Metabolomics DataR03CA211211 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI DORRESTEIN, PIETER C · 2016 to 2016
$155k
NCI NIH HHS R03 CA211211NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR029121NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103484NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM107550NIH HHS 1R03CA211211-01NIH HHS GMS10RR029121NIH HHS P41GM103484-07NIH HHS R01 GM107550
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The annotation of small molecules is one of the most challenging and important steps in untargeted mass spectrometry analysis, as most of our biological interpretations rely on structural annotations. Molecular networking has emerged as a structured way to organize and mine data from untargeted tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) experiments and has been widely applied to propagate annotations. However, propagation is done through manual inspection of MS/MS spectra connected in the spectral networks and is only possible when a reference library spectrum is available. One of the alternative approaches used to annotate an unknown fragmentation mass spectrum is through the use of in silico predictions. One of the challenges of in silico annotation is the uncertainty around the correct structure among the predicted candidate lists. Here we show how molecular networking can be used to improve the accuracy of in silico predictions through propagation of structural annotations, even when there is no match to a MS/MS spectrum in spectral libraries. This is accomplished through creating a network consensus of re-ranked structural candidates using the molecular network topology and structural similarity to improve in silico annotations. The Network Annotation Propagation (NAP) tool is accessible through the GNPS web-platform https://gnps.ucsd.edu/ProteoSAFe/static/gnps-theoretical.jsp.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntsCluster AnalysisComputational BiologyComputer SimulationDatabases, ChemicalFungiMetabolic Networks and PathwaysMetabolomicsModels, BiologicalModels, ChemicalMolecular StructureSoftwareTandem Mass Spectrometry

Identifiers

PMID29668671
PMCPMC5927460
OpenAlexW2800712778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.