ArticleMedicine2018
F-18 FDG PET, CT, and MRI for detecting the malignant potential in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A protocol for a network meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.
Article in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is a rare cancer in gastrointestinal carcinomas and has been widely known as a curable disease among all the digestive tumors. However, early detection of malignant potential in patients with GIST has still been a huge challenge all around the world. CT, MRI, and F-18 FDG PET are all considered as good tests for diagnosing malignant GIST efficiently, but no recommended suggestions presents which test among the 3 is the prior one in detecting the malignant potential of GIST. We perform this study to assess the accuracy between CT, MRI, and F-18 FDG PET through network meta-analysis method, and to rank these tests. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: PubMed, EMBASE.com, CNKI, and CBM databases will be searched without search date and language restrictions. We will include diagnostic tests which assessed the accuracy of CT, MRI, and F-18 FDG PET in detecting the malignant potential of GIST. The risk of bias in each study will be independently assessed as low, moderate, or high using criteria adapted from Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2). Meta-analysis will be performed using STATA 12.0 and R 3.4.1 software. The competing diagnostic tests will be ranked by a superiority index.
resultsThis study is ongoing, and will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication.
conclusionThis study will provide a comprehensive evidence summary of CT, MRI, and F-18 FDG PET in detecting the malignant potential of GIST.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.