Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29668382›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2018

The cross education of strength and skill following unilateral strength training in the upper and lower limbs.

Lara A Green, David A Gabriel

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03937232 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Mirrored Movement Compared to Cross-education for Recovery After Hand or Wrist Injury: a Pilot Study.

TypeinterventionalSponsorMcMaster UniversityRan2019 to 2020Enrolled80ConditionsHand InjuriesArmsCross-Education, Mirror Visual Feedback, Usual care
NCT06522464 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Effects Of Modified Constraint Induced Movement Therapy With And Without Cross Education On Upper Limb Function In Cerebral Palsy

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2024 to 2024Enrolled22ConditionsCerebral PalsyArmsGroup A: mCIMT with cross-education, Group B: mCIMT without cross-education
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Effects of Different Isometric Training Programs on Muscle Size and Function in the Elbow Flexors.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lara A GreenDepartment of Kinesiology, Brock University , St. Catharines, Ontario , Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6648-8107
David A GabrielDepartment of Kinesiology, Brock University , St. Catharines, Ontario , Canada.
Brock University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cross education is the strength gain or skill improvement transferred to the contralateral limb following unilateral training or practice. The present study examined the transfer of both strength and skill following a strength training program. Forty participants (20M, 20F) completed a 6-wk unilateral training program of dominant wrist flexion or dorsiflexion. Strength, force variability, and muscle activity were assessed pretraining, posttraining, and following 6 wk of detraining (retention). Analyses of covariance compared the experimental limb (trained or untrained) to the control (dominant or nondominant). There were no sex differences in the training response. Cross education of strength at posttraining was 6% ( P < 0.01) in the untrained arm and 13% ( P < 0.01) in the untrained leg. Contralateral strength continued to increase following detraining to 15% in the arm ( P < 0.01) and 14% in the leg ( P < 0.01). There was no difference in strength gains between upper and lower limbs ( P > 0.05). Cross education of skill (force variability) demonstrated greater improvements in the untrained limbs compared with the control limbs during contractions performed without concurrent feedback. Significant increases in V-wave amplitude ( P = 0.02) and central activation ( P < 0.01) were highly correlated with contralateral strength gains. There was no change in agonist amplitude or motor unit firing rates in the untrained limbs ( P > 0.05). The neuromuscular mechanisms mirrored the force increases at posttraining and retention supporting central drive adaptations of cross education. The continued strength increases at retention identified the presence of motor learning in cross education, as confirmed by force variability. NEW & NOTEWORTHY: We examined cross education of strength and skill following 6 wk of unilateral training and 6 wk of detraining. A novel finding was the continued increase in contralateral strength following both training and detraining. Neuromuscular adaptations were highly correlated with strength gains in the trained and contralateral limbs. Motor learning was evident in the trained and contralateral limbs during contractions performed without concurrent feedback.

Indexed as

Motor SkillsMuscle StrengthResistance TrainingAdaptation, PhysiologicalAdultElectromyographyFemaleHumansLearningLower ExtremityMaleMuscle ContractionMuscle, SkeletalUpper ExtremityYoung Adultcross-body transfercross educationelectromyographymotor learningunilateral training

Identifiers

PMID29668382
PMCPMC6139459
OpenAlexW2800880762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.