Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29667259›Full record

SynthesisHealth & social care in the community2019

The (cost-)effectiveness of preventive, integrated care for community-dwelling frail older people: A systematic review.

Wilhelmina Mijntje Looman, Robbert Huijsman, Isabelle Natalina Fabbricotti

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Health & social care in the community, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05302310 (INSPIRE), which is not on this map. Cited by 53 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05302310 completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

INSPIRE: Feasibility of a Community-based Integrated Care Model for Older Adults Living at Home

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorUniversity of BaselRan2022 to 2022Enrolled12ConditionsFrailtyArmsintegrated care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Challenges to Systems of Long-Term Care: Mapping of the Central Concepts from an Umbrella Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Cost and effects of integrated care: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Does Allostatic Load in 50-89-Year-Olds Predict the Development of Frailty? Evidence From a National Longitudinal Study Over 12 Years.Stress and health : journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wilhelmina Mijntje LoomanDepartment Health Services Management & Organisation, Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4081-3498
Robbert HuijsmanDepartment Health Services Management & Organisation, Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Isabelle Natalina FabbricottiDepartment Health Services Management & Organisation, Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Integrated care is increasingly promoted as an effective and cost-effective way to organise care for community-dwelling frail older people with complex problems but the question remains whether high expectations are justified. Our study aims to systematically review the empirical evidence for the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of preventive, integrated care for community-dwelling frail older people and close attention is paid to the elements and levels of integration of the interventions. We searched nine databases for eligible studies until May 2016 with a comparison group and reporting at least one outcome regarding effectiveness or cost-effectiveness. We identified 2,998 unique records and, after exclusions, selected 46 studies on 29 interventions. We assessed the quality of the included studies with the Effective Practice and Organization of Care risk-of-bias tool. The interventions were described following Rainbow Model of Integrated Care framework by Valentijn. Our systematic review reveals that the majority of the reported outcomes in the studies on preventive, integrated care show no effects. In terms of health outcomes, effectiveness is demonstrated most often for seldom-reported outcomes such as well-being. Outcomes regarding informal caregivers and professionals are rarely considered and negligible. Most promising are the care process outcomes that did improve for preventive, integrated care interventions as compared to usual care. Healthcare utilisation was the most reported outcome but we found mixed results. Evidence for cost-effectiveness is limited. High expectations should be tempered given this limited and fragmented evidence for the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of preventive, integrated care for frail older people. Future research should focus on unravelling the heterogeneity of frailty and on exploring what outcomes among frail older people may realistically be expected.

Indexed as

Frail ElderlyIndependent LivingAgedAged, 80 and overCaregiversComprehensive Health CareCost-Benefit AnalysisHealth ServicesHumansPatient Acceptance of Health CarePreventive Medicinecommunity-dwelling frail older peoplecost-effectivenesseffectivenessintegrated careprevention

Identifiers

PMID29667259
PMCPMC7379491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.