Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29667139›Full record

Observational studyEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2018

Spinal navigation for minimally invasive thoracic and lumbosacral spine fixation: implications for radiation exposure, operative time, and accuracy of pedicle screw placement.

T Tajsic, K Patel, R Farmer, R J Mannion, R A Trivedi

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04196153 (A Comparison of Pedicle Screws Placement Accuracy in Thoracolumbar Spine Using Two Guidance Techniques), which is not on this map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04196153 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

A Comparison of Pedicle Screws Placement Accuracy in Thoracolumbar Spine Using Two Guidance Techniques: O-arm Navigation and Cervical Distractor Screws

TypeinterventionalSponsorKing Abdullah International Medical Research CenterRan2019 to 2021Enrolled60ConditionsPedicle Screws, Surgery, Computer-Assisted/Adverse Effects, Bone Screws, Imaging, Three-Dimensional/MethodsArmsPedicle screws instrumentation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. X2P-Net: Context-Aware 2D/3D Vertebra Localization.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. Clinical observation on the effect of percutaneous pedicle screw fixation assisted by 2D computer navigation in the treatment of thoracic spine fractures.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

T TajsicDivision of Neurosurgery, Cambridge University Hospital's NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Box 167, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK. ttajsic@doctors.org.uk.
K PatelDivision of Neurosurgery, Cambridge University Hospital's NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Box 167, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
R FarmerDepartment of Radiology, Cambridge University Hospital's NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
R J MannionDivision of Neurosurgery, Cambridge University Hospital's NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Box 167, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
R A TrivediDivision of Neurosurgery, Cambridge University Hospital's NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Box 167, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNavigation is emerging as a useful adjunct in percutaneous, minimally invasive spinal surgery (MIS). The aim of this study was to compare C-Arm navigated, O-Arm navigated and conventional 2D-fluoroscopy assisted MIS thoracic and lumbosacral spine fixation techniques in terms of operating time, radiation exposure and accuracy of pedicle screw (PS) placement.

methodsRetrospective observational study of 152 consecutive adults who underwent MIS fixations for spinal instability: 96 2D-fluoroscopy assisted, 39 3D-C-Arm navigated and 27 using O-Arm navigated.

resultsO-Arm navigation significantly reduced PS misplacement (1.23%, p) compared to 3D-C-Arm navigation (7.29%, p = 0.0082) and 2D-fluoro guided placement (5.16%, p = 0379). 3D-C-Arm navigation was associated with lower procedural radiation exposure of the patient (0.4 mSv) than O-Arm navigation (3.24 mSv) or 2D-fluoro guidance (1.5 mSv). Operative time was comparable between three modalities.

conclusionsO-Arm navigation provides greater accuracy of percutaneous instrumentation placement with an acceptable procedural radiation dose delivered to the patients and comparable operative times. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary material.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFluoroscopyFracture Fixation, InternalHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleMiddle AgedMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresOperative TimePedicle ScrewsRadiation ExposureRetrospective Studies2D fluoroscopy3D fluoroscopyC-ArmMinimally invasive (MIS) spinal fixationO-ArmSpinal navigation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.