Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29667066›Full record

Trial reportCancer chemotherapy and pharmacology2018

Population exposure-response analysis of cabozantinib efficacy and safety endpoints in patients with renal cell carcinoma.

Steven Lacy, Jace Nielsen, Bei Yang, Dale Miles, Linh Nguyen, Matt Hutmacher

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Cabozantinib in advanced renal cell carcinoma: A phase II, open-label, single-arm study of Japanese patients.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2020
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Are novel oral oncolytics underdosed in obese patients?Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Steven LacyExelixis Inc., 210 East Grand Avenue, South San Francisco, CA, 94080-0511, USA. slacy@exelixis.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1657-7600
Jace NielsenAnn Arbor Pharmacometrics Group, Inc., Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Bei YangAnn Arbor Pharmacometrics Group, Inc., Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Dale MilesExelixis Inc., 210 East Grand Avenue, South San Francisco, CA, 94080-0511, USA.
Linh NguyenExelixis Inc., 210 East Grand Avenue, South San Francisco, CA, 94080-0511, USA.
Matt HutmacherAnn Arbor Pharmacometrics Group, Inc., Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Exelixis (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the phase III METEOR trial, tyrosine kinase inhibitor cabozantinib significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and overall survival compared to everolimus in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who had received prior VEGFR inhibitor therapy. In METEOR, RCC patients started at a daily 60-mg cabozantinib tablet (Cabometyx™) dose but could reduce to 40- or 20-mg to achieve a tolerated exposure. OBJECTIVES AND

methodsExposure-response (ER) models were developed to characterize the relationship between cabozantinib at clinically relevant exposures in RCC patients enrolled in METEOR and efficacy (PFS and tumor response) and safety endpoints.

resultsCompared to the average steady-state cabozantinib concentration for a 60-mg dose, exposures at simulated 40- and 20-mg starting doses were predicted to result in higher risk of disease progression or death [hazard ratios (HRs) of 1.10 and 1.39, respectively], lower maximal median reduction in tumor size (- 11.9 vs - 9.1 and - 4.5%, respectively), and lower ORR (19.1 vs 15.6 and 8.7%, respectively). The 60-mg exposure was also associated with higher risk for selected adverse events (AEs) palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (grade ≥ 1), fatigue/asthenia (grade ≥ 3), diarrhea (grade ≥ 3), and hypertension (predicted HRs of 2.21, 2.01, 1.78, and 1.85, respectively) relative to the predicted average steady-state cabozantinib concentration for a 20-mg starting dose.

conclusionER modeling predicted that cabozantinib exposures in RCC patients at the 60-mg starting dose would provide greater anti-tumor activity relative to exposures at simulated 40- and 20-mg starting doses that were associated with decreased rates of clinically relevant AEs.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnilidesCarcinoma, Renal CellDisease-Free SurvivalDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansKidney NeoplasmsProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyridinesSurvival RateTreatment OutcomeAnilidescabozantinibProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyridinesCabozantinibExposure–response modelingRenal cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID29667066
PMCPMC5973957
OpenAlexW2801596150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.