Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29667041›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2018

Perception versus reality: elucidating motivation and expectations of current fellowship council minimally invasive surgery fellows.

Jeffrey R Watkins, Aurora D Pryor, Michael S Truitt, D Rohan Jeyarajah

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Ten Year Trends in Minimally Invasive Surgery Fellowship.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jeffrey R WatkinsDepartment of Surgery, Methodist Dallas Medical Center, 1441 N Beckley Ave, Dallas, TX, 75203, USA.
Aurora D PryorDepartment of Surgery, Division of Bariatric, Foregut and Advanced Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stony Brook University Medical Center, 100 Nichols Road, HSC T19-053, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, USA.
Michael S TruittDepartment of Surgery, Methodist Dallas Medical Center, 1441 N Beckley Ave, Dallas, TX, 75203, USA.
D Rohan JeyarajahDepartment of Surgery, Methodist Dallas Medical Center, 1441 N Beckley Ave, Dallas, TX, 75203, USA. rohanjeyarajah@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of our study is to determine minimally invasive trainee motivation and expectations for their respective fellowship. Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) is one of the largest non-ACGME post-residency training pathways though little is known concerning the process of residents choosing MIS as a fellowship focus. As general surgery evolves, it is important to understand resident motivation in order to better prepare them for a surgical career.

methodsA survey invitation was sent to current trainees in the Minimally Invasive and related pathways through the Fellowship Council. The participants were asked to complete a web-based questionnaire detailing demographics, experiences preparing for fellowship, motivation in choosing an MIS fellowship, and expectations for surgical practice after fellowship.

resultsSixty-seven MIS trainees responded to the survey out of 151 invitations (44%). The Fellowship Council website, mentors, and other fellows were cited as the most helpful source of information when applying for fellowship. Trainees were active in surgical societies as residents, with 78% having membership in the ACS and 60% in SAGES. When deciding to pursue MIS as a fellowship, the desire to increase laparoscopic training was the most important factor. The least important reasons cited were lack of laparoendoscopic training in residency and desire to learn robotic surgery. The majority of trainees believed their laparoscopic skill set was above that of their residency cohort (81%). The most desired post-fellowship employment model is hospital employee (46%) followed by private practice (27%). Most fellows plan on marketing themselves as MIS surgeons (90%) or General Surgeons (78%) when in practice.

conclusionsResidents who choose MIS as a fellowship have a strong exposure to laparoscopy and want to become specialists in their field. Mentors and surgical societies including ACS and SAGES play a vital role in preparing residents for fellowship and practice.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelFellowships and ScholarshipsInternship and ResidencyMotivationClinical CompetenceGeneral SurgeryHumansLaparoscopyMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresRobotic Surgical ProceduresSpecializationSurgeonsSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesFellowFellowship councilMinimally invasive surgeryMISSurvey

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.