ReviewCurrent treatment options in neurology2018
Ictal Interictal Continuum Patterns.
Review in Current treatment options in neurology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06017973 (The Role of Cerebral Functional, Structural and Spectral Imaging in the Diagnosis, Management and Prognosis of Status Epilepticus), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Role of Cerebral Functional, Structural and Spectral Imaging in the Diagnosis, Management and Prognosis of Status Epilepticus: a Prospective Study in Patients with the Ictal-interictal Continuum
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intracranial electroencephalographic approaches in the intensive care unit: Safety, feasibility, and coverage.Epilepsia · 2026Article
- Defining the end point of status epilepticus: A scoping review and framework for standardization.Epilepsia · 2026Article
- Ictal-interictal continuum and status epilepticus: Two sides of the same coin? A prospective magnetic resonance imaging study.Epilepsia · 2026Article
- Pitfalls in ICU EEG Interpretation: A Retrospective Case Series.The Neurohospitalist · 2026Article
- Effects of epileptiform activity on discharge outcome in critically ill patients in the USA: a retrospective cross-sectional study.The Lancet. Digital health · 2023Article
- Status Epilepticus in Older Adults: Diagnostic and Treatment Considerations.Drugs & aging · 2023Article
- EEG findings in CAR T-cell-associated neurotoxicity: Clinical and radiological correlations.Neuro-oncology · 2022Article
- Seizure Management in the Intensive Care Unit.Current treatment options in neurology · 2021Review
- Prognostic significance of specific EEG patterns after cardiac arrest in a Lisbon Cohort.Clinical neurophysiology practice · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewTo present data available on the epidemiology and significance of rhythmic and periodic patterns that lie on the ictal interictal continuum and propose an algorithm for the clinical approach to patients exhibiting these patterns. RECENT
findingsThere is accumulating evidence on the prognostic implications of various rhythmic and periodic patterns in the critically ill population. These patterns are not only associated with increased seizure risk but have also been associated with worse outcome and increased long-term risk of epilepsy in recent studies. There is emerging evidence suggesting that certain EEG features as well as ancillary studies including serum, neuroimaging, and invasive multimodality monitory can assist in the risk stratification of neuronal injury associated with these patterns, allowing for a targeted approach to these patterns. We present a case illustrating the clinical nuances of these patterns. We propose an algorithm for a personalized and targeted approach to ictal interictal patterns based on risk stratification according to clinical, EEG, imaging, and invasive monitoring markers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29666958What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.