Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29666948›Full record

ArticleArchives of osteoporosis2018

Epidemiology of hip fracture in Belarus: development of a country-specific FRAX model and its comparison to neighboring country models.

H Ramanau, I Chernyanin, E Rudenka, O Lesnyak, A Zakroyeva, J P Bilezikian, H Johansson, N C Harvey, E V McCloskey, J A Kanis

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of osteoporosis, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Epidemiology of hip fracture in Botswana.Archives of osteoporosis · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. A surrogate FRAX model for the Kyrgyz Republic.Archives of osteoporosis · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A brief history of FRAX.Archives of osteoporosis · 2018
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

H RamanauGomel State Medical University, 5 Lange Street, 246050, Gomel, Belarus.
I ChernyaninMozyr Central City polyclinic, 14a Kotlovtsa Street, 247760, Mozyr, Belarus.
E RudenkaBelarusian State Medical University, 83 Dzerzhinski Ave., 220116, Minsk, Belarus.
O LesnyakNorth West State Medical University named after I.I.Mechnikov, 41, Kirochnaya Street, St. Petersburg, 191015, Russia.
A ZakroyevaUral State Medical University, 3 Repina Street, Yekaterinburg, 620028, Russia.
J P BilezikianCollege of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, 630 W. 168th Street, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
H JohanssonInstitute for Health and Ageing, Catholic University of Australia, Melbourne, Australia.
N C HarveyMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
E V McCloskeyCentre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
J A KanisInstitute for Health and Ageing, Catholic University of Australia, Melbourne, Australia. w.j.pontefract@sheffield.ac.uk.

Funding

Arthritis Research UK 17702Arthritis Research UK 21231Department of Health HTA/10/33/04Medical Research Council G0400491Medical Research Council MC_U147585819Medical Research Council MC_U147585824Medical Research Council MC_U147585827Medical Research Council MC_UP_A620_1014Medical Research Council MC_UU_12011/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fracture probabilities resulting from the newly generated FRAX model for Belarus based on regional estimates of the hip fracture incidence were compared with FRAX models of neighboring countries. Differences between the country-specific FRAX patterns and the rank orders of fracture probabilities were modest.

objectiveThis paper describes the epidemiology of hip fractures in Belarus that was used to develop the country-specific fracture prediction FRAX® tool and illustrates its features compared to models for the neighboring countries of Poland, Russia, and Lithuania.

methodsWe carried out a population-based study in a region of Belarus (the city of Mozyr) representing approximately 1.2% of the country's population. We aimed to identify all hip fractures in 2011-2012 from hospital registers and primary care sources. Age- and sex-specific incidence and national mortality rates were incorporated into a FRAX model for Belarus. Fracture probabilities were compared with those derived from FRAX models in neighboring countries.

resultsThe estimated number of hip fractures nationwide in persons over the age of 50 years for 2015 was 8250 in 2015 and is predicted to increase to 12,918 in 2050. The annual incidence of fragility hip fractures in individuals aged 50 years or more was 24.6/10,000 for women and 14.6/10,000 for men, standardized to the world population. The comparison with FRAX models in neighboring countries showed that hip fracture probabilities in men and women in Belarus were similar to those in Poland, Russia, and Lithuania. The difference in incidence rates between the surveys including or excluding data from primary care suggested that 29.1% of patients sustaining a hip fracture were not hospitalized and, therefore, did not receive specialized medical care.

conclusionA substantial proportion of hip fractures in Belarus does not come to hospital attention. The FRAX model should enhance accuracy of determining fracture probability among the Belarus population and help guide decisions about treatment.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHip FracturesHospitalizationHospitalsHumansIncidenceLithuaniaMaleMiddle AgedOsteoporotic FracturesPolandProbabilityReference StandardsEpidemiologyFracture probabilityFRAXHip fracture

Identifiers

PMID29666948
PMCPMC5904235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.