Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29666933›Full record

ArticleSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2018

[Pain relief during and after surgical procedures : Results of an Austria-wide patient survey on postoperative pain and perioperative pain management].

W Jaksch, R Likar, U Frohner, F Herbst

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

W JakschAbteilung für Anästhesie, Intensiv- und Schmerzmedizin, Wilhelminenspital, Montleartstraße 37, 1160, Wien, Österreich. wolfgang.jaksch@wienkav.at.
R LikarKlinikum Klagenfurt am Wörtersee, Klagenfurt am Wörtersee, Österreich.
U FrohnerÖsterreichischer Gesundheits- und Krankenpflegeverband, Wien, Österreich.
F HerbstKrankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder, Sigmund-Freud-Universität Wien, Wien, Österreich.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPain after surgery, especially on the first postoperative day, results in longer hospital stays, increased complication rates and may also cause a higher risk of pain chronification. However, the expected intensity of pain is often misjudged and therefore not adequately treated. METHODOLOGY: An Austria-wide patient survey on the pain situation on the first postoperative day and on the quality of perioperative pain management was carried out on a voluntary and anonymous basis.

resultsRegarding the intensity of pain a clear gender difference could be observed. Women were more prone to more severe pain than men across all age groups. This difference was most pronounced in the younger age groups (18-40 years) and in those patients showing the highest pain scores. Treatment satisfaction was correlated (high significance) with pain intensity on exercise (p < 0.01), maximum pain (p < 0.01), least pain (<0.01) and frequency of postoperative pain assessment. DISCUSSION: The risk of postoperative pain can be reduced by optimal care structures. Since patients treated in optimal care structures had significantly lower pain scores on exercise and with respect to maximum pain, the investment in the optimization of such resources should be carefully planned. Special attention should be paid to postoperative pain management in women, especially in younger female patients.

Indexed as

Pain ManagementPostoperative PainAdolescentAdultAustriaFemaleHumansMalePain MeasurementSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultFirst postoperative dayPain intensityPatient educationPatient surveyPostoperative pain management

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.