Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29666909›Full record

ReviewDer Pathologe2019

[Aggressive B‑cell lymphomas : Recommendations from the German Panel of Reference Pathologists in the Competence Network on Malignant Lymphomas on diagnostic procedures according to the current WHO classification, update 2017].

W Klapper, F Fend, A Feller, M L Hansmann, P Möller, H Stein, A Rosenwald, G Ott

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Pathologe, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

W KlapperInstitut für Pathologie, Sektion Hämatopathologie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, Haus 14, 24105, Kiel, Deutschland. wklapper@path.uni-kiel.de.
F FendInstitut für Pathologie und Neuropathologie, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland.
A FellerHämatopathologie Lübeck, Lübeck, Deutschland.
M L HansmannDr. Senckenbergisches Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Deutschland.
P MöllerInstitut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Deutschland.
H SteinPathodiagnostik Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland.
A RosenwaldPathologisches Institut, Universität Würzburg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken, Mainfranken, Deutschland.
G OttAbteilung für Klinische Pathologie, Robert-Bosch-Krankenhaus, Dr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch-Institut für Klinische Pharmakologie, Stuttgart, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The update of the 4th edition of the WHO classification for hematopoietic neoplasms introduces changes in the field of mature aggressive B‑cell lymphomas that are relevant to diagnostic pathologists. In daily practice, the question arises of which analysis should be performed when diagnosing the most common lymphoma entity, diffuse large B‑cell lymphoma. We discuss the importance of the cell of origin, the analysis of MYC translocations, and the delineation of the new WHO entities of high-grade B‑cell lymphomas.

Indexed as

Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffusePathologistsHumansTranslocation, GeneticWorld Health OrganizationDiffuse large B‑cell lymphomaGenetic translocationImmunohistochemistryNon-Hodgkin lymphomaWorld Health Organization

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.