ReviewAmerican journal of clinical and experimental urology2018
Structure and function analysis in circulating tumor cells: using nanotechnology to study nuclear size in prostate cancer.
Review in American journal of clinical and experimental urology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Stem cell-like circulating tumor cells indicate poor prognosis in gastric cancer.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2022Article
- Liquid Biopsy as a Tool for Differentiation of Leiomyomas and Sarcomas of Corpus Uteri.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
- Shedding light on the EpCAM: An overview.Journal of cellular physiology · 2019Review
- A Circulating Tumor Cell-RNA Assay for Assessment of Androgen Receptor Signaling Inhibitor Sensitivity in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.Theranostics · 2019Article
- Biomaterials to model and measure epithelial cancers.Nature reviews. Materials · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Professor Donald Coffey and his laboratory pioneered studies showing the relationships between nuclear shape and cellular function. In doing so, he and his students established the field of nuclear morphometry in prostate cancer. By using perioperative tissues via biopsies and surgical sampling, Dr. Coffey's team discovered that nuclear shape and other pathologic features correlated with clinical outcome measures. Cancer cells also exist outside of solid tumor masses as they can be shed from both primary and metastatic lesions into the circulatory system. The pool of these circulating tumor cells (CTCs) is heterogeneous. While some of these CTCs are passively shed into the circulation, others are active metastasizers with invasive potential. Advances in nanotechnology now make it possible to study morphologic features such as nuclear shape of CTCs in the bloodstream via liquid biopsy. Compared to traditional tissue sampling, liquid biopsy allows for minimally invasive, repetitive, and systemic disease sampling, which overcomes disease misrepresentation issues due to tumor temporospatial heterogeneity. Our team developed a novel liquid biopsy approach, the NanoVelcro assay, which allows us to identify morphologic heterogeneity in the CTC compartment. By applying classical methods of nuclear morphometry, we identified very small nuclear CTCs (vsnCTCs) in prostate cancer patients. Our initial studies showed that vsnCTCs strongly correlated with unfavorable clinical behaviors including the disposition to visceral metastases. These approaches may continue to yield additional insights into dynamic clinical behaviors, which creates an opportunity for more comprehensive and accurate cancer profiling. Ultimately, these advancements will allow physicians to employ more accurate and personalized treatments, helping the field reach the goal of true precision medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29666832PMC5902722W2983119973What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.