ArticlePeerJ2018
Characterization of antimicrobial resistance genes in
Article in PeerJ, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evidence for Genotype-Associated Differences in Disease Severity and Limitations of Serotype-Based Classification inPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Syndrome-specific antimicrobial escalation and diagnostic stewardship gaps in large-scale Hungarian pig farms: a cross-sectional survey.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Genomic insight into the diversity ofmSphere · 2024Article
- Molecular characterization of Glaesserella parasuis strains circulating in North American swine production systems.BMC veterinary research · 2023Article
- Assessment of the Macrophage Scavenger Receptor CD163 in MediatingVeterinary sciences · 2023Article
- Article
- Serotyping and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profiling ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Metal Ion Periplasmic-Binding Protein YfeA ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Assessment of animal diseases caused by bacteria resistant to antimicrobials: Swine.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2021Article
- Article
- Evidence for Establishing the Clinical Breakpoint of Cefquinome against Haemophilus Parasuis in China.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Whole-genome sequence analyses ofPeerJ · 2020Article
- Polyamine Transport Protein PotD Protects Mice againstVaccines · 2019Article
- Epidemiology ofPeerJ · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background
methodsWe screened 143
resultsSusceptibility test showed that all isolates were low resistance to lomefloxacin (28.67%), levofloxacin (20.28%), norfloxacin (22.38%), ciprofloxacin (23.78%), however, high resistance levels were found to nalidixic acid (82.52%) and enrofloxacin (55.94%). In addition, we found 14 antimicrobial resistance genes were present in these isolates, including DISCUSSION: The current study demonstrated that the high antibiotic resistance of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.