Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29666611›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2018

Genome Sequence, Assembly and Characterization of Two

Edoardo Piombo, Noa Sela, Michael Wisniewski, Maria Hoffmann, Maria L Gullino, Marc W Allard, Elena Levin, Davide Spadaro, Samir Droby

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Bio-protection in oenology byFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Whole-Genome Sequencing and Annotation of the YeastJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  6. Comparative analysis ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  7. Computational Analysis of HTS Data and Its Application in Plant Pathology.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. The GenusMicroorganisms · 2020
    Review
  18. Microorganisms · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Edoardo PiomboDepartment of Agricultural, Forestry and Food Sciences, University of Torino, Turin, Italy.
Noa SelaDepartment of Plant Pathology and Weed Research, Agricultural Research Organization, Volcani Center, Rishon LeZion, Israel.
Michael WisniewskiUnited States Department of Agriculture - Agricultural Research Service, Kernersville, WV, United States.
Maria HoffmannDivision of Microbiology, United States Food and Drug Administration, College Park, MD, United States.
Maria L GullinoDepartment of Agricultural, Forestry and Food Sciences, University of Torino, Turin, Italy.
Marc W AllardDivision of Microbiology, United States Food and Drug Administration, College Park, MD, United States.
Elena LevinDepartment of Postharvest Science, Agricultural Research Organization, Volcani Center, Rishon LeZion, Israel.
Davide SpadaroDepartment of Agricultural, Forestry and Food Sciences, University of Torino, Turin, Italy.
Samir DrobyDepartment of Postharvest Science, Agricultural Research Organization, Volcani Center, Rishon LeZion, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The yeast

Indexed as

biocontrol agentfungigenome annotationgenome assemblyplant pathogen interactionspostharvest pathology

Identifiers

PMID29666611
PMCPMC5891927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.