Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29666440›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Clinical oncology2018

Analysis of DNA methylation in cancer: location revisited.

Alexander Koch, Sophie C Joosten, Zheng Feng, Tim C de Ruijter, Muriel X Draht, Veerle Melotte, Kim M Smits, Jurgen Veeck, James G Herman, Leander Van Neste and 3 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 428 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
428citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

428 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A multidimensional pan-cancer analysis of CD47 and its role in promoting malignant phenotype in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

368 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Alexander KochDepartment of Pathology, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9804-7602
Sophie C JoostenDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Zheng FengDepartment of Pathology, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Tim C de RuijterDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Muriel X DrahtDepartment of Pathology, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Veerle MelotteDepartment of Pathology, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Kim M SmitsDepartment of Pathology, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Jurgen VeeckDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands.
James G HermanLung Cancer Program, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, The Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Leander Van NesteDepartment of Pathology, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Wim Van CriekingeBioBix: Laboratory of Bioinformatics and Computational Genomics, Department of Mathematical Modelling, Statistics and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Tim De MeyerDepartment of Mathematical Modelling, Statistics and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Manon van EngelandDepartment of Pathology, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands. manon.van.engeland@mumc.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Changes in DNA methylation in cancer have been heralded as promising targets for the development of powerful diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive biomarkers. Despite the existence of more than 14,000 scientific publications describing DNA methylation-based biomarkers and their clinical associations in cancer, only 14 of these biomarkers have been translated into a commercially available clinical test. Methodological and experimental obstacles are both major causes of this disparity, but the genomic location of a DNA methylation-based biomarker is an intrinsic and essential property that also has an important and often overlooked role. Here, we examine the importance of the location of DNA methylation for the development of cancer biomarkers, and take a detailed look at the genomic location and other relevant characteristics of the various biomarkers with commercially available tests. We also emphasize the value of publicly available databases for the development of DNA methylation-based biomarkers and the importance of accurate reporting of the full methodological details of research findings.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticBiomarkers, TumorDNA MethylationGenome, HumanHumansNeoplasmsBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.