ArticleScientific reports2018
Generalized concurrence in boson sampling.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Towards the Simplest Model of Quantum Supremacy: Atomic Boson Sampling in a Box Trap.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Classical Modelling of a Bosonic Sampler with Photon Collisions.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Multi-Qubit Bose-Einstein Condensate Trap for Atomic Boson Sampling.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- The boundary for quantum advantage in Gaussian boson sampling.Science advances · 2022Article
- Unification of the Nature's Complexities via a Matrix Permanent-Critical Phenomena, Fractals, Quantum Computing, ♯P-Complexity.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Universal bound on sampling bosons in linear optics and its computational implications.National science review · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A fundamental question in linear optical quantum computing is to understand the origin of the quantum supremacy in the physical system. It is found that the multimode linear optical transition amplitudes are calculated through the permanents of transition operator matrices, which is a hard problem for classical simulations (boson sampling problem). We can understand this problem by considering a quantum measure that directly determines the runtime for computing the transition amplitudes. In this paper, we suggest a quantum measure named "Fock state concurrence sum" C
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.