ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018
Digitizing omics profiles by divergence from a baseline.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- PhosCancer: A comprehensive database for investigating protein phosphorylation in human cancer.iScience · 2024Article
- CellBiAge: Improved single-cell age classification using data binarization.Cell reports · 2023Article
- Comprehensive Analysis of Ubiquitously Expressed Genes in Humans from A Data-driven Perspective.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Transcriptomic Harmonization as the Way for Suppressing Cross-Platform Bias and Batch Effect.Biomedicines · 2022Review
- Efficient representations of tumor diversity with paired DNA-RNA aberrations.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Multi-Omics Model Applied to Cancer Genetics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- An R package for divergence analysis of omics data.PloS one · 2021Article
- Identifying Personalized Metabolic Signatures in Breast Cancer.Metabolites · 2020Article
- Computational Oncology in the Multi-Omics Era: State of the Art.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Review
- Differential Variation Analysis Enables Detection of Tumor Heterogeneity Using Single-Cell RNA-Sequencing Data.Cancer research · 2019Article
- QnAs with Donald Geman.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Data collected from omics technologies have revealed pervasive heterogeneity and stochasticity of molecular states within and between phenotypes. A prominent example of such heterogeneity occurs between genome-wide mRNA, microRNA, and methylation profiles from one individual tumor to another, even within a cancer subtype. However, current methods in bioinformatics, such as detecting differentially expressed genes or CpG sites, are population-based and therefore do not effectively model intersample diversity. Here we introduce a unified theory to quantify sample-level heterogeneity that is applicable to a single omics profile. Specifically, we simplify an omics profile to a digital representation based on the omics profiles from a set of samples from a reference or baseline population (e.g., normal tissues). The state of any subprofile (e.g., expression vector for a subset of genes) is said to be "divergent" if it lies outside the estimated support of the baseline distribution and is consequently interpreted as "dysregulated" relative to that baseline. We focus on two cases: single features (e.g., individual genes) and distinguished subsets (e.g., regulatory pathways). Notably, since the divergence analysis is at the individual sample level, dysregulation can be analyzed probabilistically; for example, one can estimate the probability that a gene or pathway is divergent in some population. Finally, the reduction in complexity facilitates a more "personalized" and biologically interpretable analysis of variation, as illustrated by experiments involving tissue characterization, disease detection and progression, and disease-pathway associations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.