Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29666141›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2018

Examining the effectiveness of consuming flour made from agronomically biofortified wheat (Zincol-2016/NR-421) for improving Zn status in women in a low-resource setting in Pakistan: study protocol for a randomised, double-blind, controlled cross-over trial (BiZiFED).

Nicola M Lowe, Muhammad Jaffar Khan, Martin R Broadley, Munir H Zia, Harry J McArdle, Edward J M Joy, Heather Ohly, Babar Shahzad, Ubaid Ullah, Gul Kabana and 2 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Nicola M LoweInternational Institute of Nutritional Sciences and Applied Food Safety Studies, Faculty of Health and Wellbeing, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.
Muhammad Jaffar KhanInstitute of Basic Medical Sciences, Khyber Medical University, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Martin R BroadleySchool of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonnington Campus, Leicestershire, UK.
Munir H ZiaResearch and Development Department, Fauji Fertilizer Company Limited, Rawalpindi, Punjab, Pakistan.
Harry J McArdleSchool of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonnington Campus, Leicestershire, UK.
Edward J M JoyDepartment of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Heather OhlyInternational Institute of Nutritional Sciences and Applied Food Safety Studies, Faculty of Health and Wellbeing, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.
Babar ShahzadInstitute of Basic Medical Sciences, Khyber Medical University, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Ubaid UllahInstitute of Basic Medical Sciences, Khyber Medical University, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Gul KabanaAbaseen Foundation, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Rashid MedhiAbaseen Foundation, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Mukhtiar Zaman AfridiDivision of Medicine, Medical Teaching Institution, Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P02338X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDietary zinc (Zn) deficiency is a global problem, particularly in low-income and middle-income countries where access to rich, animal-source foods of Zn is limited due to poverty. In Pakistan, Zn deficiency affects over 40% of the adult female population, resulting in suboptimal immune status and increased likelihood of complications during pregnancy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We are conducting a double-blind, randomised controlled feeding study with cross-over design in a low-resource setting in Pakistan. Households were provided with flour milled from genetically and agronomically biofortified grain (Zincol-2016/NR-421) or control grain (Galaxy-2013). Fifty households were recruited. Each household included a woman aged 16-49 years who is neither pregnant nor breastfeeding, and not currently consuming nutritional supplements. These women were the primary study participants. All households were provided with control flour for an initial 2-week baseline period, followed by an 8-week intervention period where 25 households receive biofortified flour (group A) and 25 households receive control flour (group B). After this 8-week period, groups A and B crossed over, receiving control and biofortified flour respectively for 8 weeks. Tissue (blood, hair and nails) have been collected from the women at five time points: baseline, middle and end of period 1, and middle and end of period 2. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was granted from the lead university (reference no. STEMH 697 FR) and the collaborating institution in Pakistan. The final study methods (including any modifications) will be published in peer-reviewed journals, alongside the study outcomes on completion of the data analysis. In addition, findings will be disseminated to the scientific community via conference presentations and abstracts and communicated to the study participants through the village elders at an appropriate community forum. REGISTRATION DETAILS: The trial has been registered with the ISRCTN registry, study ID ISRCTN83678069.

Indexed as

DietFlourTriticumZincAdolescentAdultAnimalsCross-Over StudiesDeveloping CountriesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPakistanPregnancyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicZincagronomic biofortificationpakistanwheatzinczinc status

Identifiers

PMID29666141
PMCPMC5905768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.