ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2018
General Practitioners' Perspective on eHealth and Lifestyle Change: Qualitative Interview Study.
Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04880005 (Protocol for the Digital, Individualized, and Collaborative Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in General Practice Based on Decision Aid), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Protocol for the Digital, Individualized, and Collaborative Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in General Practice Based on Decision Aid (DICTA) - A Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long-term Weight Loss in a Primary Care-Anchored eHealth Lifestyle Coaching Program: Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Trial
- Reversing Type 2 Diabetes in a Primary Care-Anchored eHealth Lifestyle Coaching Programme in Denmark: A Randomised Controlled Trial.Nutrients · 2022Trial
- GPs' perceptions of digital technology for behavior change interventions for community-dwelling older adults: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Prerequisites for primary care in obesity counselling and management: a quantitative, exploratory survey of general practitioners in the federal Republic of Germany.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- Bridging the knowledge gap: a mixed-methods study on general practitioners' information needs for mHealth apps in hypertension treatment in Germany.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Health Care Professionals' Perspectives on Using eHealth Tools in Advanced Home Care: Qualitative Interview Study.JMIR human factors · 2025Article
- Editorial: Digital health applications: acceptance, benefit assessment, and costs from the perspective of patients and medical professionals.Frontiers in health services · 2024Article
- Two years of approved digital health applications in Germany - Perspectives and experiences of general practitioners with an affinity for their use.The European journal of general practice · 2023Article
- Stakeholders' Perceptions Regarding Digital Therapeutics Reimbursement in South Korea: Qualitative Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2023Article
- Attitudes and experiences of registered diabetes specialists in using health apps for managing type 2 diabetes: results from a mixed-methods study in Germany 2021/2022.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2023Article
- [What potential and added value do DiGA offer for primary care?-Results of a survey of general practitioners in Germany].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2022Article
- Comparison of Daily Routines Between Middle-aged and Older Participants With and Those Without Diabetes in the Electronic Framingham Heart Study: Cohort Study.JMIR diabetes · 2022Article
- Facilitators of and Barriers to Lifestyle Support and eHealth Solutions: Interview Study Among Health Care Professionals Working in Cardiac Care.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Article
- The impact of data from remote measurement technology on the clinical practice of healthcare professionals in depression, epilepsy and multiple sclerosis: survey.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2021Article
- General Practitioners' Perceptions of the Use of Wearable Electronic Health Monitoring Devices: Qualitative Analysis of Risks and Benefits.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2021Article
- eHealth for neonatal nurse education despite Covid-19.Journal of neonatal nursing : JNN · 2021Article
- The use of health apps in primary care-results from a survey amongst general practitioners in Germany.Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2021Article
- Identification of Important Factors Affecting Use of Digital Individualised Coaching and Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in General Practice: A Qualitative Feasibility Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWearables, fitness apps, and patient home monitoring devices are used increasingly by patients and other individuals with lifestyle challenges. All Danish general practitioners (GPs) use digital health records and electronic health (eHealth) consultations on a daily basis, but how they perceive the increasing demand for lifestyle advice and whether they see eHealth as part of their lifestyle support should be explored further.
objectiveThis study aimed to explore GPs' perspectives on eHealth devices and apps and the use of eHealth in supporting healthy lifestyle behavior for their patients and themselves.
methodsA total of 10 (5 female and 5 male) GPs were recruited by purposive sampling, aged 38 to 69 years (mean 51 years), of which 4 had an urban uptake of patients and 6 a rural uptake. All of them worked in the region of Southern Denmark where GPs typically work alone or in partnership with 1 to 4 colleagues and all use electronic patient health records for prescription, referral, and asynchronous electronic consultations. We performed qualitative, semistructured, individual in-depth interviews with the GPs in their own office about how they used eHealth and mHealth devices to help patients challenged with lifestyle issues and themselves. We also interviewed how they treated lifestyle-challenged patients in general and how they imagined eHealth could be used in the future.
resultsAll GPs had smartphones or tablets, and everyone communicated on a daily basis with patients about disease and medicine via their electronic health record and the internet. We identified 3 themes concerning the use of eHealth: (1) how eHealth is used for patients; (2) general practitioners' own experience with improving lifestyle and eHealth support; and (3) relevant coaching techniques for transformation into eHealth.
conclusionsGPs used eHealth frequently for themselves but only infrequently for their patients. GPs are familiar with behavioral change techniques and are ready to use them in eHealth if they are used to optimize processes and not hinder other treatments. Looking ahead, education of GPs and recognizing patients' ability and preference to use eHealth with regard to a healthy living are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.