ArticleThe international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease2018
Conducting efficacy trials in children with MDR-TB: what is the rationale and how should they be done?
Article in The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Surgery for deformities in pediatric spinal tuberculosis: single centre review of 51 cases.Spine deformity · 2025Article
- A framework for considering the risk-benefit trade-off in designing noninferiority trials using composite outcome approaches.Statistics in medicine · 2021Article
- Immunological Aspects of Diagnosis and Management of Childhood Tuberculosis.Infection and drug resistance · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Paediatric anti-tuberculosis treatment trials have traditionally been limited to Phase I/II studies evaluating the drug pharmacokinetics and safety in children, with assumptions about efficacy made by extrapolating data from adults. However, it is increasingly being recognised that, in some circumstances, efficacy trials are required in children. The current treatment for children with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) is long and toxic; shorter, safer regimens, using novel agents, require urgent evaluation. Given the changing pattern of drug metabolism, disease spectrum and rates of TB disease confirmation with age, decisions around inclusion criteria require careful consideration. The most straightforward MDR-TB efficacy trial would include only children with confirmed MDR-TB and no additional drug resistance. Given that it may be unclear at the time treatment is initiated whether the diagnosis will ultimately be confirmed and what the final drug resistance profile will be, this presents a unique challenge in children. Recruiting only these children would, however, limit the generalisability of such a trial, as in reality the majority of children with TB do not have bacteriologically confirmed disease. Given the good existing treatment outcomes with current routine regimens for children with MDR-TB, conducting a superiority trial may not be the optimal design. Demonstrating non-inferiority of efficacy, but superiority with regard to safety, would be an alternative strategy. Using standardised control and experimental MDR-TB treatment regimens is challenging given the wide spectrum of paediatric disease. However, using variable regimens would make interpretation challenging. A paediatric MDR-TB efficacy trial is urgently needed, and with global collaboration and capacity building, is highly feasible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.