Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29665870›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and infection2018

Application of multiblock modelling to identify key drivers for antimicrobial use in pig production in four European countries.

L Collineau, S Bougeard, A Backhans, J Dewulf, U Emanuelson, E Grosse Beilage, A Lehébel, S Lösken, M Postma, M Sjölund and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and infection, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Risk Factors for Antimicrobial Use on Irish Pig Farms.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

L CollineauSAFOSO AG,Liebefeld,Switzerland.
S BougeardAnses - French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety,Ploufragan,France.
A BackhansDepartment of Clinical Sciences,Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences,Uppsala,Sweden.
J DewulfVeterinary Epidemiology Unit,Department of Reproduction,Obstetrics and Herd Health,Faculty of Veterinary Medicine,Ghent University,Merelbeke,Belgium.
U EmanuelsonDepartment of Clinical Sciences,Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences,Uppsala,Sweden.
E Grosse BeilageField Station for Epidemiology,University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover,Bakum,Germany.
A LehébelBIOEPAR, INRA,Oniris,Nantes,France.
S LöskenField Station for Epidemiology,University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover,Bakum,Germany.
M PostmaVeterinary Epidemiology Unit,Department of Reproduction,Obstetrics and Herd Health,Faculty of Veterinary Medicine,Ghent University,Merelbeke,Belgium.
M SjölundDepartment of Clinical Sciences,Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences,Uppsala,Sweden.
K D C StärkSAFOSO AG,Liebefeld,Switzerland.
V H M VisschersUniversity of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland,School of Applied Psychology,Olten,Switzerland.
C BellocBIOEPAR, INRA,Oniris,Nantes,France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial use in pig farming is influenced by a range of risk factors, including herd characteristics, biosecurity level, farm performance, occurrence of clinical signs and vaccination scheme, as well as farmers' attitudes and habits towards antimicrobial use. So far, the effect of these risk factors has been explored separately. Using an innovative method called multiblock partial least-squares regression, this study aimed to investigate, in a sample of 207 farrow-to-finish farms from Belgium, France, Germany and Sweden, the relative importance of the six above mentioned categories or 'blocks' of risk factors for antimicrobial use in pig production. Four country separate models were developed; they showed that all six blocks provided useful contribution to explaining antimicrobial use in at least one country. The occurrence of clinical signs, especially of respiratory and nervous diseases in fatteners, was one of the largest contributing blocks in all four countries, whereas the effect of the other blocks differed between countries. In terms of risk management, it suggests that a holistic and country-specific mitigation strategy is likely to be more effective. However, further research is needed to validate our findings in larger and more representative samples, as well as in other countries.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAnimal HusbandryAnimalsAnti-Infective AgentsCross-Sectional StudiesEuropeFarmersHumansLeast-Squares AnalysisModels, TheoreticalRisk FactorsSwineSwine DiseasesVaccinationAnti-Infective AgentsAntibioticantimicrobialsmultiblock partial least-squares regressionpig productionrisk mitigation

Identifiers

PMID29665870
PMCPMC9184958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.