Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29665853›Full record

ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2018

Microsatellite instability in prostate cancer by PCR or next-generation sequencing.

Jennifer A Hempelmann, Christina M Lockwood, Eric Q Konnick, Michael T Schweizer, Emmanuel S Antonarakis, Tamara L Lotan, Bruce Montgomery, Peter S Nelson, Nola Klemfuss, Stephen J Salipante and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
12.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. MLH1 Loss in Primary Prostate Cancer.JCO precision oncology · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Jennifer A HempelmannDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Christina M LockwoodDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Eric Q KonnickDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Michael T SchweizerDepartment of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Emmanuel S AntonarakisDepartment of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Tamara L LotanDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Bruce MontgomeryDepartment of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Peter S NelsonDepartment of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Nola KlemfussHuman Biology Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Stephen J SalipanteDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Colin C PritchardDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. cpritch@uw.edu.
University of Washington · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · USJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Washington Medical Center · USVA Puget Sound Health Care System · US

Funding

TRANSCRIPTOME AND PROTEOME STRATIFICATION OF PROSTATE ADENOCARCINOMA PHENOTYPESP50CA097186 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI John Kyung Lee · 2002 to 2026
$58.1M
Steroid Metabolism in Castration-Resistant Prostate CancerP01CA163227 · NCI · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI Steven P. Balk · 2013 to 2026
$25.0M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA163227NCI NIH HHS P50 CA097186NIH HHS P50CA97186
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMicrosatellite instability (MSI) is now being used as a sole biomarker to guide immunotherapy treatment for men with advanced prostate cancer. Yet current molecular diagnostic tests for MSI have not been evaluated for use in prostate cancer.

methodsWe evaluated two next-generation sequencing (NGS) MSI-detection methods, MSIplus (18 markers) and MSI by Large Panel NGS (> 60 markers), and compared the performance of each NGS method to the most widely used 5-marker MSI-PCR detection system. All methods were evaluated by comparison to targeted whole gene sequencing of DNA mismatch-repair genes, and immunohistochemistry for mismatch repair genes, where available.

resultsIn a set of 91 prostate tumors with known mismatch repair status (29-deficient and 62-intact mismatch-repair) MSIplus had a sensitivity of 96.6% (28/29) and a specificity of 100% (62/62), MSI by Large Panel NGS had a sensitivity of 93.1% (27/29) and a specificity of 98.4% (61/62), and MSI-PCR had a sensitivity of 72.4% (21/29) and a specificity of 100% (62/62).

conclusionsWe found that the widely used 5-marker MSI-PCR panel has inferior sensitivity when applied to prostate cancer and that NGS testing with an expanded panel of markers performs well. In addition, NGS methods offer advantages over MSI-PCR, including no requirement for matched non-tumor tissue and an automated analysis pipeline with quantitative interpretation of MSI-status.

Indexed as

Microsatellite InstabilityHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMalePolymerase Chain ReactionProstatic NeoplasmsCapillary electrophoresisMicrosatellite instabilityMismatch repairMSImSINGSNext-generation sequencingNGSPromegaProstate adenocarcinoma

Identifiers

PMID29665853
PMCPMC5904988
OpenAlexW2799894585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.