Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29665825›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2018

Evaluation of fluorimetry and direct visualization to interpret results of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification kit to detect Leishmania DNA.

Ana V Ibarra-Meneses, Israel Cruz, Carmen Chicharro, Carmen Sánchez, Sylvain Biéler, Tobias Broger, Javier Moreno, Eugenia Carrillo

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Moving towards on-site detection of Shiga toxin-producingCurrent research in food science · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Novel CRISPR-based detection ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. LAMP in Neglected Tropical Diseases: A Focus on Parasites.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  18. Rapid diagnosis ofJournal of biosciences · 2021
    Article
  19. Evaluation of Loopamp™Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ana V Ibarra-MenesesWHO Collaborating Centre for Leishmaniasis, National Centre for Microbiology, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Israel CruzFoundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, Geneva, Switzerland.
Carmen ChicharroWHO Collaborating Centre for Leishmaniasis, National Centre for Microbiology, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Carmen SánchezWHO Collaborating Centre for Leishmaniasis, National Centre for Microbiology, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Sylvain BiélerFoundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, Geneva, Switzerland.
Tobias BrogerFoundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, Geneva, Switzerland.
Javier MorenoWHO Collaborating Centre for Leishmaniasis, National Centre for Microbiology, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Eugenia CarrilloWHO Collaborating Centre for Leishmaniasis, National Centre for Microbiology, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain. ecarrillo@isciii.es.
Instituto de Salud Carlos III · ESFoundation for Innovative New Diagnostics · CH

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 202060457Ministry of Foreign Affairs 22211
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) have proven to be advantageous in the diagnosis of leishmaniases, allowing sensitive diagnosis of: (i) cutaneous leishmaniasis in long duration lesions and (ii) visceral leishmaniasis using a less-invasive sample like peripheral blood, in opposition to tissue aspiration required for parasite demonstration by microscopy. Despite their benefits, the implementation of NAATs for leishmaniasis diagnosis at the point-of-care has not been achieved yet, mostly due to the complexity and logistical issues associated with PCR-based methods.

methodsIn this work, we have evaluated the performance of a ready-to-use loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) kit using two real time fluorimeters to amplify leishmanial DNA obtained by silica column-based and Boil & Spin protocols.

resultsThe different approaches used to run and interpret the LAMP reactions showed a performance equivalent to PCR and real-time PCR, using spiked and clinical samples. The time to positivity obtained with real-time fluorimetry showed an excellent correlation with both Ct values and parasite load from real-time quantitative PCR.

conclusionsThe results obtained open the possibility of using a highly stable, ready-to-use LAMP kit for the accurate diagnosis of leishmaniasis at the point-of-care. Furthermore, the feasibility of relating time to positivity, determined with a portable real-time fluorimeter, with the parasite burden could have a wider application in the management of leishmaniasis, such as in treatment efficacy monitoring or as a pharmacodynamics tool in clinical trials.

Indexed as

ColorimetryFluorometryHumansLeishmaniaLeishmaniasisMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesPoint-of-Care TestingBoil & SpinDiagnosticsLAMPLeishmaniasisLess-invasive diagnosisLoopamp™ Leishmania detection kitLoop-mediated isothermal amplificationNon-invasive diagnosisReal-time fluorimetersVisceral leishmaniasis

Identifiers

PMID29665825
PMCPMC5905109
OpenAlexW2804100433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.