Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29665802›Full record

Observational studyBMC public health2018

An observational study of immigrant mortality differences in Norway by reason for migration, length of stay and characteristics of sending countries.

Astri Syse, Minja T Dzamarija, Bernadette N Kumar, Esperanza Diaz

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Astri SyseStatistics Norway, Oslo, Norway. sya@ssb.no.ORCID 0000-0003-1754-1594
Minja T DzamarijaStatistics Norway, Oslo, Norway.
Bernadette N KumarThe Norwegian Centre for Minority Health Research, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Esperanza DiazThe Norwegian Centre for Minority Health Research, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Norwegian Institute of Public Health · NOStatistics Norway · NO

Funding

Norges Forskningsråd 256678Norwegian Ministry of Justice and Public Security Not applicable
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKnowledge of mortality differentials in immigrant groups depending on their reason for migration, length of stay in host countries and characteristics of sending countries may be beneficial for policy interventions aimed to improve various immigrant groups' health and welfare.

methodsWe employed discrete-time hazard regression models with time-varying covariates to compare the death risk of immigrants to those of Norwegian-born natives using linked register data on the Norwegian population aged 25-79 during 1990-2015. More than 492,000 deaths occurred in around 4.6 million individuals. All analyses were adjusted for sex, age, calendar time and sociodemographic characteristics.

resultsImmigrants had an 11% survival advantage overall. Those immigrating due to work or education had the lowest death risk, whereas refugees had the highest death risk (albeit lower than that of natives). Death risks increased markedly with length of stay, and were most pronounced for those having spent more than 40% of their lives in Norway. Net of reason for migration, only minor differences were observed depending on Human Development Index characteristics of sending countries.

conclusionIndependent of reason for migration and characteristics of sending countries, those who immigrate to Norway in adulthood appear to be particularly healthy. The higher death risk associated with prolonged lengths of stay suggests that disadvantageous 'acculturation' or stress factors related to the post-migration period may play a role in the long run. The health and welfare of long-term immigrants thus warrants further research.

Indexed as

Health Status DisparitiesMortalityAdultAgedEmigrants and ImmigrantsEmigration and ImmigrationFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedNorwayPopulation GroupsRefugeesRisk FactorsAcculturationHealthy migrantImmigrantLength of stayMortalityNorwayReason for migrationSocial causation

Identifiers

PMID29665802
PMCPMC5905163
OpenAlexW2804032376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.