ArticleCancer medicine2018
Establishment of a nine-gene prognostic model for predicting overall survival of patients with endometrial carcinoma.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular and AI enabled prognostication in endometrial cancer a 2015 to 2024 bibliometric Atlas and critical review.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- BUB1, BUB1B, CCNA2, and CDCA8, along with miR-524-5p, as clinically relevant biomarkers for the diagnosis and treatment of endometrial carcinoma.BMC cancer · 2023Article
- The landscape and prognostic value of immune characteristics in uterine corpus endometrial cancer.Bioscience reports · 2021Article
- Tumor mutation burden in connection with immune-related survival in uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma.Cancer cell international · 2021Article
- Establishing a Prognostic Signature Based on Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition-Related Genes for Endometrial Cancer Patients.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Article
- Identification of an immune gene signature for predicting the prognosis of patients with uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma.Cancer cell international · 2020Article
- Novel miRNA markers for the diagnosis and prognosis of endometrial cancer.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2020Article
- Biomarker Signatures of Quality for Engineering Nasal Chondrocyte-Derived Cartilage.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Article
- Prognostic Potential of Alternative Splicing Markers in Endometrial Cancer.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2019Article
- A novel alternative splicing-based prediction model for uteri corpus endometrial carcinoma.Aging · 2019Article
- Clinical and Expression Significance of AKT1 by Co-expression Network Analysis in Endometrial Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2019Article
- Establishment of a nine-gene prognostic model for predicting overall survival of patients with endometrial carcinoma.Cancer medicine · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endometrial carcinoma (EC) is the most common malignant tumor of the female genital tract in developed countries. The prognosis of early stage EC is favorable, but a subset faces high risk of cancer progression or recurrence. EC has a poor prognosis upon progression to advanced or metastatic stages. Therefore, our goal is to build a robust prognostic model for predicting overall survival (OS) in EC patients. In this study, 1571 genes were identified as being associated with OS based on genomewide expression profiles using a training dataset. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes enrichment analysis revealed that these genes were involved in various cancer-related signaling pathways. Nine signature genes were further selected using stepwise selection, and their potential role in the development of EC was demonstrated by performing differential expression analysis between EC and normal uterine tissues. A prognostic model that aggregated these nine signature genes was ultimately established and effectively divided EC patients into two risk groups. OS for patients in the high-risk group was significantly poorer compared with that of the low-risk group. This nine-gene model was subsequently validated and evaluated using the TCGA dataset and shown to have a high discriminating power to distinguish EC patients with an elevated risk of mortality based on the FIGO staging system and other prognostic factors. This study provides a novel prognostic model for the identification of EC patients with elevated risk of mortality and will help to improve our understanding of the underlying mechanisms involved in prognostic EC factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.