Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29664924›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Evidence supporting a role for astrocytes in the regulation of cognitive flexibility and neuronal oscillations through the Ca2+ binding protein S100β.

Adam T Brockett, Gary A Kane, Patrick K Monari, Brandy A Briones, Pierre-Antoine Vigneron, Gabriela A Barber, Andres Bermudez, Uma Dieffenbach, Alexander D Kloth, Timothy J Buschman and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Neuroprotective actions of norepinephrine in neurological diseases.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Adam T BrockettPrinceton Neuroscience Institute and Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, United States of America.
Gary A KanePrinceton Neuroscience Institute and Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, United States of America.
Patrick K MonariPrinceton Neuroscience Institute and Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, United States of America.
Brandy A BrionesPrinceton Neuroscience Institute and Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, United States of America.
Pierre-Antoine VigneronPrinceton Neuroscience Institute and Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, United States of America.
Gabriela A BarberPrinceton Neuroscience Institute and Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, United States of America.
Andres BermudezPrinceton Neuroscience Institute and Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, United States of America.
Uma DieffenbachPrinceton Neuroscience Institute and Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, United States of America.
Alexander D KlothDepartment of Cell Biology and Physiology and Neuroscience Center University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.
Timothy J BuschmanPrinceton Neuroscience Institute and Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, United States of America.
Elizabeth GouldPrinceton Neuroscience Institute and Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8358-0236
Princeton University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) is important for cognitive flexibility, the ability to switch between two task-relevant dimensions. Changes in neuronal oscillations and alterations in the coupling across frequency ranges have been correlated with attention and cognitive flexibility. Here we show that astrocytes in the mPFC of adult male Sprague Dawley rats, participate in cognitive flexibility through the astrocyte-specific Ca2+ binding protein S100β, which improves cognitive flexibility and increases phase amplitude coupling between theta and gamma oscillations. We further show that reduction of astrocyte number in the mPFC impairs cognitive flexibility and diminishes delta, alpha and gamma power. Conversely, chemogenetic activation of astrocytic intracellular Ca2+ signaling in the mPFC enhances cognitive flexibility, while inactivation of endogenous S100β among chemogenetically activated astrocytes in the mPFC prevents this improvement. Collectively, our work suggests that astrocytes make important contributions to cognitive flexibility and that they do so by releasing a Ca2+ binding protein which in turn enhances coordinated neuronal oscillations.

Indexed as

2-Aminoadipic AcidAnimalsAstrocytesCalcium SignalingCognitionExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsGamma RhythmMaleNeuronsPrefrontal CortexRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyS100 Calcium Binding Protein beta SubunitTheta Rhythm2-Aminoadipic AcidExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsS100b protein, ratS100 Calcium Binding Protein beta Subunit

Identifiers

PMID29664924
PMCPMC5903631
OpenAlexW2801531600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.