Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29664167›Full record

SynthesisReviews in medical virology2018

Clinical outcomes of current medical approaches for Middle East respiratory syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Mostafa Ebraheem Morra, Le Van Thanh, Mohamed Gomaa Kamel, Ahmed Abdelmotaleb Ghazy, Ahmed M A Altibi, Lu Minh Dat, Tran Ngoc Xuan Thy, Nguyen Lam Vuong, Mostafa Reda Mostafa, Sarah Ibrahim Ahmed and 7 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Reviews in medical virology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 93 papers, 15 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
93citing papers in PubMed, 15 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

93 citing papers in PubMed, 15 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2020
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Mostafa Ebraheem MorraFaculty of Medicine, Alazhar University, Cairo, Egypt.
Le Van ThanhOnline Research Club (http://www.onlineresearchclub.org/).
Mohamed Gomaa KamelOnline Research Club (http://www.onlineresearchclub.org/).
Ahmed Abdelmotaleb GhazyDepartment of Cardiology, Shebin El-Kom Teaching Hospital, Shibin El Kom, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-9145-7115
Ahmed M A AltibiUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Lu Minh DatOnline Research Club (http://www.onlineresearchclub.org/).
Tran Ngoc Xuan ThyOnline Research Club (http://www.onlineresearchclub.org/).
Nguyen Lam VuongOnline Research Club (http://www.onlineresearchclub.org/).
Mostafa Reda MostafaOnline Research Club (http://www.onlineresearchclub.org/).
Sarah Ibrahim AhmedFaculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.
Sahar Samy ElabdFaculty of Medicine, Benha University, Benha, Egypt.
Samreen FathimaDeccan College of Medical Sciences, University of Health and Sciences, Hyderabad, India.
Tran Le Huy VuUniversity of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Ali S OmraniDepartment of Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Ziad A MemishMinistry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Kenji HirayamaDepartment of Immunogenetics, Institute of Tropical Medicine (NEKKEN), Leading Graduate School Program, and Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan.
Nguyen Tien HuyEvidence Based Medicine Research Group & Faculty of Applied Sciences, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0002-9543-9440

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) is a respiratory disease caused by MERS coronavirus. Because of lack of vaccination, various studies investigated the therapeutic efficacy of antiviral drugs and supportive remedies. A systematic literature search from 10 databases was conducted and screened for relevant articles. Studies reporting information about the treatment of MERS coronavirus infection were extracted and analyzed. Despite receiving treatment with ribavirin plus IFN, the case fatality rate was as high as 71% in the IFN-treatment group and exactly the same in patients who received supportive treatment only. Having chronic renal disease, diabetes mellitus and hypertension increased the risk of mortality (P < .05), and chronic renal disease is the best parameter to predict the mortality. The mean of survival days from onset of illness to death was 46.6 (95% CI, 30.5-62.6) for the IFN group compared with 18.8 (95% CI, 10.3-27.4) for the supportive-only group (P = .001). Delay in starting treatment, older age group, and preexisting comorbidities are associated with worse outcomes. In conclusion, there is no difference between IFN treatment and supportive treatment for MERS patients in terms of mortality. However, ribavirin and IFN combination might have efficacious effects with timely administration and monitoring of adverse events. Large-scale prospective randomized studies are required to assess the role of antiviral drugs for the treatment of this high mortality infection.

Indexed as

Middle East Respiratory Syndrome CoronavirusAntiviral AgentsCoronavirus InfectionsFemaleHumansInterferonsMaleRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeAntiviral AgentsInterferonsinterferonMERS-CoVMiddle East respiratory syndromesystematic review

Identifiers

PMID29664167
PMCPMC7169085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.